Sort by
Novel Intranasal Replication-Deficient NS1ΔC Flu Vaccine Confers Protection from Divergent Influenza A and B Viruses in Mice
Daria Shamakova
,Marina A. Shuklina
,Nikita Yolshin
,Ekaterina Romanovskaya-Romanko
,Anna-Polina Shurygina
,Kira Kudrya
,Arman Muzhikyan
,Mariia V. Sergeeva
,Marina Stukova
Posted: 12 December 2025
A Two-Tier Systems Medicine Model for Human Longevity: Restorative and Regenerative Pathways to the 120-Year Lifespan Potential
Richard Z. Cheng
Posted: 12 December 2025
Restoration of CYP2D6 Inhibition and Full Remission of Obsessive-Compulsive Symptoms: A Case-Oriented Review
Ngo Cheung
Posted: 12 December 2025
Robotic-Assisted Versus Laparoscopic Surgery for Colorectal Resection in Oncologic Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials (2025)
Hussein Mussa Muafa
,Malika Abdu Balkam
Background: Robotic-assisted surgery (RAS) is increasingly used for colorectal cancer (CRC), but its clinical and oncologic advantages over conventional laparoscopy (LS) remain uncertain. Prior meta-analyses have included overlapping RCTs but vary in methodology, scope, and analytical transparency. This review aims to provide an updated, independently re-analyzed synthesis of RCTs published from 2015–2025, with full PRISMA compliance, explicit analytic reproducibility, and expanded evaluation of bias and evidence certainty. Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted according to PRISMA guidelines. The protocol was retrospectively registered in PROSPERO (Registration ID: CRD420251237158). PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane CENTRAL were searched (January 1, 2015–January 31, 2025). Full reproducible search strings, PICOS criteria, and inclusion/exclusion rules were predefined. Only RCTs comparing RAS vs LS for malignant colorectal disease were included. Data extraction was performed independently by two reviewers. Meta-analyses used DerSimonian–Laird random-effects models; standardized procedures were applied for converting medians/IQRs into means/SDs and for continuity corrections in zero-event trials. Risk of bias was assessed using Cochrane RoB 2.0, and evidence certainty was graded using GRADE. Results: A total of 12 RCTs encompassing 3,107 patients met the inclusion criteria. RAS resulted in significantly lower conversion-to-open rates (OR 0.42; 95% CI 0.28–0.63; I²=18%) compared with LS. Operative time was consistently longer with RAS (MD +23.8 minutes; 95% CI 14.2–33.4; I²=67%). Overall postoperative complications (Clavien–Dindo ≥II) were comparable (OR 0.91; 95% CI 0.76–1.13; I²=22%). Length of stay showed a small but significant reduction with RAS (MD −0.8 days; 95% CI −1.3 to −0.2; I²=49%). Pathologic outcomes showed lower circumferential resection margin (CRM) positivity with RAS (OR 0.59; 95% CI 0.41–0.85). Lymph node retrieval was slightly higher with RAS (MD +0.71 nodes; 95% CI 0.25–1.18). Distal margins and TME completeness were equivalent. No RCT reported mature long-term oncologic outcomes; evidence remains limited to short-term surrogates. Conclusions: In contemporary RCTs, RAS provides fewer conversions and slightly better pathologic surrogates, while maintaining similar morbidity compared to LS. The main trade-off remains longer operative time and higher resource use. True oncologic equivalence cannot be confirmed until long-term RCT data mature. Advanced imaging (e.g., SOMATOM Force CT), age-specific MIS evidence, and the emergence of endoluminal robotic systems are likely to shape future refinements in technique and patient selection.
Background: Robotic-assisted surgery (RAS) is increasingly used for colorectal cancer (CRC), but its clinical and oncologic advantages over conventional laparoscopy (LS) remain uncertain. Prior meta-analyses have included overlapping RCTs but vary in methodology, scope, and analytical transparency. This review aims to provide an updated, independently re-analyzed synthesis of RCTs published from 2015–2025, with full PRISMA compliance, explicit analytic reproducibility, and expanded evaluation of bias and evidence certainty. Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted according to PRISMA guidelines. The protocol was retrospectively registered in PROSPERO (Registration ID: CRD420251237158). PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane CENTRAL were searched (January 1, 2015–January 31, 2025). Full reproducible search strings, PICOS criteria, and inclusion/exclusion rules were predefined. Only RCTs comparing RAS vs LS for malignant colorectal disease were included. Data extraction was performed independently by two reviewers. Meta-analyses used DerSimonian–Laird random-effects models; standardized procedures were applied for converting medians/IQRs into means/SDs and for continuity corrections in zero-event trials. Risk of bias was assessed using Cochrane RoB 2.0, and evidence certainty was graded using GRADE. Results: A total of 12 RCTs encompassing 3,107 patients met the inclusion criteria. RAS resulted in significantly lower conversion-to-open rates (OR 0.42; 95% CI 0.28–0.63; I²=18%) compared with LS. Operative time was consistently longer with RAS (MD +23.8 minutes; 95% CI 14.2–33.4; I²=67%). Overall postoperative complications (Clavien–Dindo ≥II) were comparable (OR 0.91; 95% CI 0.76–1.13; I²=22%). Length of stay showed a small but significant reduction with RAS (MD −0.8 days; 95% CI −1.3 to −0.2; I²=49%). Pathologic outcomes showed lower circumferential resection margin (CRM) positivity with RAS (OR 0.59; 95% CI 0.41–0.85). Lymph node retrieval was slightly higher with RAS (MD +0.71 nodes; 95% CI 0.25–1.18). Distal margins and TME completeness were equivalent. No RCT reported mature long-term oncologic outcomes; evidence remains limited to short-term surrogates. Conclusions: In contemporary RCTs, RAS provides fewer conversions and slightly better pathologic surrogates, while maintaining similar morbidity compared to LS. The main trade-off remains longer operative time and higher resource use. True oncologic equivalence cannot be confirmed until long-term RCT data mature. Advanced imaging (e.g., SOMATOM Force CT), age-specific MIS evidence, and the emergence of endoluminal robotic systems are likely to shape future refinements in technique and patient selection.
Posted: 12 December 2025
From Toxicity to Immunity: Evaluating CAR‐T and Conventional Therapies in Multiple Myeloma Through QALY Outcomes
Guluzar Gulnur Itez
,Asuman Sunguroğlu
Posted: 12 December 2025
ExoBDNF Probiotic Supplementation Enhances Cognition in Subjective Cognitive Decline
Ching-En Lin
,Li-Fen Chen
,Wen-Hui Fang
,Chuan-Chia Chang
,Hsin-An Chang
Background: Interventions targeting the gut–brain axis offer potential for mitigating Subjective Cognitive Decline (SCD), a critical window for Alzheimer’s prevention. This study evaluated the effects of a novel probiotic supplement, ExoBDNF, on cognitive function, sleep, and emotional distress in adults with SCD. Methods: In this 9-week open-label study, participants received ExoBDNF supplementation. Efficacy was assessed using the SCD-Questionnaire (SCD-Q), DASS-21, PSQI, MoCA, and a computerized cognitive battery measuring inhibition (Go/No-Go), flexibility (Task Switching), and working memory. Results: Post-intervention analyses revealed significant improvements in subjective cognition (SCD-Q, p < 0.001), sleep quality (PSQI, p < 0.001), and emotional distress (DASS-21, p < 0.001). Objective cognitive performance also improved, with significant gains in MoCA scores (p = 0.047) and executive function metrics. Spearman correlation analysis indicated a significant link between cognitive and emotional changes: longitudinal reductions in SCD scores correlated with concurrent reductions in emotional distress (rho = 0.471, p = 0.009). Furthermore, higher baseline SCD scores predicted greater improvement in emotional outcomes (rho = -0.540, p = 0.002). Conclusion: ExoBDNF supplementation significantly enhanced cognitive performance, sleep quality, and emotional well-being. The findings demonstrate that improvements in subjective cognition are closely tied to alleviated emotional distress, supporting the gut–brain axis as a viable therapeutic target for early-stage cognitive decline.
Background: Interventions targeting the gut–brain axis offer potential for mitigating Subjective Cognitive Decline (SCD), a critical window for Alzheimer’s prevention. This study evaluated the effects of a novel probiotic supplement, ExoBDNF, on cognitive function, sleep, and emotional distress in adults with SCD. Methods: In this 9-week open-label study, participants received ExoBDNF supplementation. Efficacy was assessed using the SCD-Questionnaire (SCD-Q), DASS-21, PSQI, MoCA, and a computerized cognitive battery measuring inhibition (Go/No-Go), flexibility (Task Switching), and working memory. Results: Post-intervention analyses revealed significant improvements in subjective cognition (SCD-Q, p < 0.001), sleep quality (PSQI, p < 0.001), and emotional distress (DASS-21, p < 0.001). Objective cognitive performance also improved, with significant gains in MoCA scores (p = 0.047) and executive function metrics. Spearman correlation analysis indicated a significant link between cognitive and emotional changes: longitudinal reductions in SCD scores correlated with concurrent reductions in emotional distress (rho = 0.471, p = 0.009). Furthermore, higher baseline SCD scores predicted greater improvement in emotional outcomes (rho = -0.540, p = 0.002). Conclusion: ExoBDNF supplementation significantly enhanced cognitive performance, sleep quality, and emotional well-being. The findings demonstrate that improvements in subjective cognition are closely tied to alleviated emotional distress, supporting the gut–brain axis as a viable therapeutic target for early-stage cognitive decline.
Posted: 12 December 2025
Diagnostic Methods for Tuberculosis: Clinical Applicability and Integrated Testing Workflows
Eduarda Rabello
,Fernanda De-Paris
Posted: 12 December 2025
Effect of Sonication on the Disruption of Gram-Negative Bacterial Biofilms Associated with Prosthetic Joint Infections (PJI) at Different Maturation Stages: An In Vitro Study
Natally Dos Santos Silva
,Cynthia Regina Pedrosa Soares
,Fábio André Brayner dos Santos
,Paulo Sérgio Ramos de Araújo
Background/Objectives: Periprosthetic joint infections (PJIs) remain one of the most challenging complications after arthroplasties due to the ability of pathogens to form biofilms on implant surfaces. Although staphylococci predominate, Gram-negative bacilli, have increasingly been associated with more aggressive clinical courses and diagnostic failure. This study aimed to evaluate the structural characteristics and maturation of E. coli and P. aeruginosa biofilms and to assess the effectiveness of a standardized sonication protocol in disrupting these biofilms and releasing viable cells. Methods: Biofilms of E. coli (ATCC 25922) and P. aeruginosa (ATCC 53278) were grown on polyethylene catheter segments for 24, 48, and 72 hours. Morphological and structural features were assessed by scanning electron microscopy. A standardized sonication protocol was then applied to evaluate its ability to disrupt the extracellular polymeric matrix. Viability of released cells was confirmed by culturing aliquots of the sonication fluid on BHI agar. Biofilms were produced in triplicate for each time point. Results: Both species formed increasingly dense and structured biofilms over time. Mature biofilms exhibited markedly thicker EPS layers compared to 24-h biofilms. P. aeruginosa developed highly complex, multilayered matrices, while E. coli produced characteristic but less elaborate biofilm structures. Sonication consistently disrupted immature and mature biofilms of both organisms, fragmenting the matrix and releasing individual or small clusters of bacterial cells. Cultures from the sonication fluid demonstrated that bacterial cells remained viable following the procedure. Conclusions: The standardized sonication protocol effectively disrupted Gram-negative biofilms at different maturation stages and released viable microorganisms, reinforcing its value as a complementary diagnostic tool for PJIs, especially in chronic or low-grade infections where conventional culture methods show reduced sensitivity.
Background/Objectives: Periprosthetic joint infections (PJIs) remain one of the most challenging complications after arthroplasties due to the ability of pathogens to form biofilms on implant surfaces. Although staphylococci predominate, Gram-negative bacilli, have increasingly been associated with more aggressive clinical courses and diagnostic failure. This study aimed to evaluate the structural characteristics and maturation of E. coli and P. aeruginosa biofilms and to assess the effectiveness of a standardized sonication protocol in disrupting these biofilms and releasing viable cells. Methods: Biofilms of E. coli (ATCC 25922) and P. aeruginosa (ATCC 53278) were grown on polyethylene catheter segments for 24, 48, and 72 hours. Morphological and structural features were assessed by scanning electron microscopy. A standardized sonication protocol was then applied to evaluate its ability to disrupt the extracellular polymeric matrix. Viability of released cells was confirmed by culturing aliquots of the sonication fluid on BHI agar. Biofilms were produced in triplicate for each time point. Results: Both species formed increasingly dense and structured biofilms over time. Mature biofilms exhibited markedly thicker EPS layers compared to 24-h biofilms. P. aeruginosa developed highly complex, multilayered matrices, while E. coli produced characteristic but less elaborate biofilm structures. Sonication consistently disrupted immature and mature biofilms of both organisms, fragmenting the matrix and releasing individual or small clusters of bacterial cells. Cultures from the sonication fluid demonstrated that bacterial cells remained viable following the procedure. Conclusions: The standardized sonication protocol effectively disrupted Gram-negative biofilms at different maturation stages and released viable microorganisms, reinforcing its value as a complementary diagnostic tool for PJIs, especially in chronic or low-grade infections where conventional culture methods show reduced sensitivity.
Posted: 12 December 2025
Disease‑Modifying Trials in Parkinson’s Disease: Challenges, Lessons, and Future Directions
Jamir Pitton Rissardo
,Ana Leticia Fornari Caprara
Parkinson’s disease (PD) is a progressive neurodegenerative disorder lacking approved therapies that slow or halt its underlying pathology. Despite decades of research, disease-modifying trials have faced persistent challenges, including patient heterogeneity, insensitive endpoints, and confounding symptomatic effects. Recent advances in biomarker science and adaptive trial frameworks offer strategies to overcome these limitations. Enrichment designs using α-synuclein seed amplification assays, dopamine transporter imaging, and genetic stratification for GBA1 or LRRK2 variants improve mechanistic alignment and statistical power in early-phase studies. Concurrently, platform trials and master protocols enable simultaneous evaluation of multiple interventions under a unified infrastructure, reducing resource waste compared to traditional sequential designs. However, gaps remain in defining sensitive outcomes, mitigating symptomatic confounders, and ensuring equitable access to biomarker-driven strategies. Future directions emphasize precision medicine approaches integrating multi-omics, digital biomarkers, and AI-driven prognostic models to optimize patient selection and endpoint sensitivity. Equity and diversity must be prioritized to address underrepresentation of racial and ethnic minorities, while ethical frameworks for genetic testing and biomarker disclosure are essential. Regulatory agencies increasingly support qualification of enrichment biomarkers, digital endpoints, and adaptive designs, alongside accelerated approval pathways. The aim of this review is to synthesize current challenges, lessons learned, and emerging strategies to guide the design of efficient, inclusive, and mechanistically aligned disease-modifying trials in PD.
Parkinson’s disease (PD) is a progressive neurodegenerative disorder lacking approved therapies that slow or halt its underlying pathology. Despite decades of research, disease-modifying trials have faced persistent challenges, including patient heterogeneity, insensitive endpoints, and confounding symptomatic effects. Recent advances in biomarker science and adaptive trial frameworks offer strategies to overcome these limitations. Enrichment designs using α-synuclein seed amplification assays, dopamine transporter imaging, and genetic stratification for GBA1 or LRRK2 variants improve mechanistic alignment and statistical power in early-phase studies. Concurrently, platform trials and master protocols enable simultaneous evaluation of multiple interventions under a unified infrastructure, reducing resource waste compared to traditional sequential designs. However, gaps remain in defining sensitive outcomes, mitigating symptomatic confounders, and ensuring equitable access to biomarker-driven strategies. Future directions emphasize precision medicine approaches integrating multi-omics, digital biomarkers, and AI-driven prognostic models to optimize patient selection and endpoint sensitivity. Equity and diversity must be prioritized to address underrepresentation of racial and ethnic minorities, while ethical frameworks for genetic testing and biomarker disclosure are essential. Regulatory agencies increasingly support qualification of enrichment biomarkers, digital endpoints, and adaptive designs, alongside accelerated approval pathways. The aim of this review is to synthesize current challenges, lessons learned, and emerging strategies to guide the design of efficient, inclusive, and mechanistically aligned disease-modifying trials in PD.
Posted: 12 December 2025
Microbial Steroids: Novel Frameworks, and Bioactivity Profiles
Valery M. Dembitsky
,Alexander O. Terent’ev
Posted: 12 December 2025
Liquid Biopsy–Based Biomolecular Alterations for the Diagnosis of Triple-Negative Breast Cancer in Adults: A Scoping Review
Orieta Navarrete-Fernández
,Eddy Mora
,Josué Rivadeneira
,Víctor Herrera
,Ángela L. Riffo-Campos
Background/Objectives: Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is an aggressive subtype, with limited diagnostic options and no targeted early detection tools. Liquid biopsy represents a minimally invasive approach for detecting tumor-derived molecular alterations in body fluids. This scoping review aimed to comprehensively synthesize all liquid biopsy–derived molecular biomarkers evaluated for the diagnosis of TNBC in adults. Methods: This review followed the Arksey and O’Malley framework and PRISMA-ScR guidelines. Systematic searches of PubMed, Scopus, Embase, and Web of Science identified primary human studies evaluating circulating molecular biomarkers for TNBC diagnosis. Non-TNBC, non-human, hereditary, treatment-response, and non-molecular studies were excluded. Data on study design, patient characteristics, biospecimen type, analytical platforms, biomarker class, and diagnostic performance were extracted and synthesized descriptively by biomolecule class. Results: Thirty-two studies met inclusion criteria, comprising 15 protein-based, 11 RNA-based, and 6 DNA-based studies (one reporting both protein and RNA). In total, 1532 TNBC cases and 3137 participants in the comparator group were analyzed. Protein biomarkers were the most frequently studied, although only APOA4 appeared in more than one study, with conflicting results. RNA-based biomarkers identified promising candidates, particularly miR-21, but validation cohorts were scarce. DNA methylation markers showed promising diagnostic accuracy yet lacked replication. Most studies were small retrospective case–control designs with heterogeneous comparators and inconsistent diagnostic reporting. Conclusions: Evidence for liquid biopsy–derived biomarkers in TNBC remains limited, heterogeneous, and insufficiently validated. No biomarker currently shows reproducibility suitable for clinical implementation. Robust, prospective, and standardized studies are needed to advance liquid biopsy–based diagnostics in TNBC.
Background/Objectives: Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is an aggressive subtype, with limited diagnostic options and no targeted early detection tools. Liquid biopsy represents a minimally invasive approach for detecting tumor-derived molecular alterations in body fluids. This scoping review aimed to comprehensively synthesize all liquid biopsy–derived molecular biomarkers evaluated for the diagnosis of TNBC in adults. Methods: This review followed the Arksey and O’Malley framework and PRISMA-ScR guidelines. Systematic searches of PubMed, Scopus, Embase, and Web of Science identified primary human studies evaluating circulating molecular biomarkers for TNBC diagnosis. Non-TNBC, non-human, hereditary, treatment-response, and non-molecular studies were excluded. Data on study design, patient characteristics, biospecimen type, analytical platforms, biomarker class, and diagnostic performance were extracted and synthesized descriptively by biomolecule class. Results: Thirty-two studies met inclusion criteria, comprising 15 protein-based, 11 RNA-based, and 6 DNA-based studies (one reporting both protein and RNA). In total, 1532 TNBC cases and 3137 participants in the comparator group were analyzed. Protein biomarkers were the most frequently studied, although only APOA4 appeared in more than one study, with conflicting results. RNA-based biomarkers identified promising candidates, particularly miR-21, but validation cohorts were scarce. DNA methylation markers showed promising diagnostic accuracy yet lacked replication. Most studies were small retrospective case–control designs with heterogeneous comparators and inconsistent diagnostic reporting. Conclusions: Evidence for liquid biopsy–derived biomarkers in TNBC remains limited, heterogeneous, and insufficiently validated. No biomarker currently shows reproducibility suitable for clinical implementation. Robust, prospective, and standardized studies are needed to advance liquid biopsy–based diagnostics in TNBC.
Posted: 12 December 2025
Integrated Biomarker-Volumetric Profiling Defines Neurodegenerative Subtypes and Predicts Neuroaxonal Injury in Multiple Sclerosis Based on Bayesian and Machine Learning Analyses
Alin Ciubotaru
,Roxana Covali
,Cristina Grosu
,Daniel Alexa
,Laura Riscanu
,Bîlcu Robert-Valentin
,Radu Popa
,Gabriela Dumachita Sargu
,Cristina Popa
,Cristina Filip
+4 authors
Posted: 12 December 2025
Adjuvant Radiotherapy After Surgical Excision of Desmoplastic Melanoma: A Systematic Review of Local Control and Survival Outcomes
Omar Alqaisi
,Kelvin Wong
,Edward Yu
,Kurian Joseph
Posted: 12 December 2025
Neuroimmune Mechanisms in Traumatic Brain Injury and Cancer: Parallel Courses or Existence in Different Orbits
Mariia Zhukova
,Natalia Ermakova
,Edgar Pan
,Evgenii Skurikhin
Posted: 12 December 2025
Safety and Efficacy of Approved and Unapproved Peptide Therapies for Musculoskeletal Injuries and Athletic Performance
Christopher L. Mendias
,Tariq M. Awan
Posted: 12 December 2025
Characteristics of the Fatty Acid Composition in Elderly Patients with Occupational Pathology from Organophosphate Exposure
Nikolay V. Goncharov
,Elena I. Savelieva
,Tatiana A. Koneva
,Lyudmila K. Gustyleva
,Irina A. Vasilieva
,Mikhail V. Belyakov
,Natalia G. Voitenko
,Daria A. Belinskaia
,Ekaterina A. Korf
,Richard O. Jenkins
Posted: 12 December 2025
Integrated Stress Response (ISR) Modulators in Vascular Diseases
Alexander Kalinin
,Ekaterina Zubkova
,Irina Beloglazova
,Yelena Parfyonova
,Mikhail Menshikov
Posted: 12 December 2025
Influenza Vaccine Immunogenicity in Hemodialysis Patients
Anna-Polina Shurygina
,Ekaterina Romanovskaya-Romanko
,Vera Krivitskaya
,Mariia Sergeeva
,Janna Buzitskaya
,Kirill Vasilyev
,Marina Shuklina
,Konstantin Vishnevskii
,Smotrov Dmitry
,Tutin Aleksey
+2 authors
Posted: 12 December 2025
The Role of High-Flow Nasal Cannula (HFNC) During Flexible Bronchoscopy in Adult Patients with Moderate Respiratory Dysfunctions: An Observational Study
Francesco Coppolino
,Pasquale Sansone
,Gianluigi Cosenza
,Simona Brunetti
,Francesca Piccialli
,Marco Fiore
,Clelia Esposito
,Maria Caterina Pace
,Vincenzo Pota
Posted: 12 December 2025
Expression of Costimulatory Molecules CD80 and CD86 in Type 2 Immune-Mediated Diseases
Olga Sergeevna Boeva
,Vadim Igorevich Borisevich
,Veronika Sergeevna Abbasova
,Daria Vladimirovna Demina
,Vera Makarovna Nepomnyaschich
,Marina Ivanovna Leonova
,Vladimir Aleksandrovich Kozlov
,Ekaterina Aleksandrovna Pashkina
Posted: 12 December 2025
of 944