Digital twin technology is widely promoted as a transformative step for precision live-stock farming, yet no fully realized, engineering-grade digital twins are deployed in commercial dairy or poultry systems today. Existing platforms are better described as near-digital-twin systems with partial sensing and modelling, digital-twin-inspired prototypes, simulation frameworks or decision-support tools that are often labelled as twins despite lacking continuous synchronization and closed-loop control. This distinction matters because the empirical foundation supporting many claims remains limited. Three critical gaps emerge: lifecycle carbon impacts of digital infrastructures are rarely quantified even as sustainability benefits are frequently asserted; field-validated improvements in feed efficiency, particularly in poultry feed conversion ratio, are scarce and inconsistent; and systematic reporting of failure rates, downtime and technology abandonment is almost absent, leaving uncertainties about long-term reliability. Adoption barriers persist across technical, economic and social dimensions, including rural connectivity limitations, sensor durability challenges, capital and operating costs, and farmer concerns regarding data rights, transparency and trust. Progress for cows and chickens will require rigorous validation in commercial environments, integration of mechanistic and statistical modelling, open and modular architectures and governance structures that support biological, economic and environmental accountability whilst ensuring that system intelligence is worth its material and energy cost.