Submitted:
09 October 2025
Posted:
15 October 2025
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
Keywords:
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
Plant Material
Experimental Conditions
Measurements and Analyses
Data Processing and Statistical Methods
3. Results and Discussion
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
Abbreviations
| RA | Regular atmosphere |
| CA | Controlled atmosphere |
| MAP | Modified atmosphere packaging |
| SL | Shelf life |
| FF | Flesh firmness |
| TSS | Total soluble solids |
| TA | Titratable acidity |
References
- FAOSTAT (//www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/TP). https://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/QCL/visualize.
- Gheribi, E. Związki polifenolowe w owocach i warzywach. Medycyna Rodzinna 2011, 4/2011, 111–115. [Google Scholar]
- Gopalan, A.; Reuben, S.C.; Ahmad, S.; Darvesh, A.S.; Hohmann, J.; Bishayee, A. The health benefits of blackcurrants. Food Funct. 2012, 3, 795–809. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gryszczyńska, B.; Iskra, M.; Gryszczyńska, A.; Budzyń, M. Aktywność przeciwutleniająca wybranych owoców jagodowych. Postępy Fitoterapii 2011, 4/2011, 265–274. [Google Scholar]
- Jurgiel-Malecka, G.; Buchwał, A. Charakterystyka składu chemicznego owoców porzeczki uprawianej w regionie Pomorza Zachodniego. Żywność. Nauka. Technologia. Jakość 2016, 6, 90–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kowalski, R.; Gonzalez de Mejia, E. Phenolic composition, antioxidant capacity and physical characterization of ten blackcurrant (Ribes nigrum) cultivars, their juices, and the inhibition of type 2 diabetes and inflammation biochemical markers. Food Chemistry 2021, 359, 129889. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Lister, C.E.; Wilson, P.E.; Sutton, K.H.; Morrison, S.C. Understanding the health benefits of blackcurrants. Acta Hortic. 2002, 585, 443–449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Manganaris, G.A.; Goulas, V.; Vicente, A.R.; Terry, L.A. Berry antioxidants: small fruits providing large benefits. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2013, 94, 825–833. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nile, S.H.; Park, S.W. Edible berries: Bioactive components and their effect on human health. Nutrition 2014, 30, 134–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Nour, V.; Trandafir, I.; Ionica, M.E. Ascorbic acid, anthocianins, organic acids and mineral content of some black and red currant cultivars. Fruits 2011, 66, 353–362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Okatan, V. Antioxidant properties and phenolic profile of the most widely appreciated cultivated berry species: A comparative study. Folia Hort. 2020, 32, 79–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rachtan-Janicka, J.; Ponder, A.; Hallmann, E. The effect of organic and conventional cultivations on antioxidants content in blackcurrant (Ribes nigrum L.) species. Appl. Sci. 2021, 11, 5113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tian, Y.; Laaksonen, O.; Haikonen, H.; Vanag, A.; Ejaz, H.; Linderborg, K.; Karhu, S.; Yang, B. Compositional diversity among blackcurrant (Ribes nigrum) cultivars originating from European countries. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2019, 67, 5621–5633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Michalska, A.; Wojdyło, A.; Lech, K.; Łysiak, G.P.; Figiel, A. Effect of different drying techniques on physical properties, total polyphenols and antioxidant capacity of blackcurrant pomace powders. LWT – Food Science and Technology 2017, 78, 114–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Michalska, A.; Wojdyło, A.; Łysiak, G.P.; Lech, K.; Figiel, A. Functional relationships between phytochemicals and drying conditions during the processing of blackcurrant pomace into powders. Advanced Powder Technology 2017, 28, 1340–1348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vicente, A.R.; Sozzi, G.O. Ripening and postharvest storage of ‘soft fruits’. Fruit, Vegetable and Cereal Science and Biotechnology 2007, 1, 95–103. [Google Scholar]
- Gross, K.C.; Wang, C.Y.; Saltveit, M. The Commercial Storage of Fruits, Vegetables, and Florist and Nursery Stocks. Agriculture Handbook Number 66, United States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, 2016.
- Story, A.; Simons, D.H. Handling and Storage Practices for Fresh Fruit and Vegetables. Australian United Fresh Fruit and Vegetable Association Ltd., Victoria, Australia, 1989.
- Batzer, U.; Helm, H.-. -U. Lagerung von Beerenobst (Storage of small fruits). Erwerbsobstbau 1999, 41, 51–55. [Google Scholar]
- Prange, R.K. Currant, Gooseberry, and Eldelberry. In: The commercial storage of fruits, vegetables, and florist and nursery stocks. Gross, K.C.; Wang, Ch.Y.; Saltveit, M. (Eds.), USDA, Agricultural Research Service. Agriculture Handbook 66, 2004, 306–309.
- Thompson, A.K.; Prange, R.K.; Bancroft, R.; Putttongsiri, T. Recommended storage conditions for selected crops. In: Controlled atmosphere storage of fruits and vegetables. 2018, 116-191. [CrossRef]
- Adobati, A.; Uboldi, E.; Franzetti, L.; Limbo, S. Shelf life extension of raspberry: Passive and active modified atmosphere inside master bag solutions. Chemical Engineering Transactions 2015, 44, 337–342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Briano, R.; Giuggioli, N.R.; Girgenti, V.; Peano, C. Biodegradable and compostable film and modified atmosphere packaging in postharvest supply chain of raspberry fruits (cv. Grandeur). Journal of Food Processing and Preservation 2015, 39, 2061–2073. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Huynh, N.K.; Wilson, M.D.; Eyles, A.; Stanley, R.A. Recent advances in postharvest technologies to extend the shelf life of blueberries (Vaccinium sp.), raspberries (Rubus idaeus L.) and blackberries (Rubus sp.). Journal of Berry Research 2019, 9, 687–707. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pinto, L.; Palma, A.; Cefola, M.; Pace, B.; D’Aquino, S.; Carboni, C.; Baruzzi, F. Effect of modified atmosphere packaging (MAP) and gaseous ozone pre-packaging treatment on the physico-chemical, microbiological and sensory quality of small berry fruit. Food Packaging and Shelf Life 2020, 26, 100573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Stewart, D.; Oparka, J.; Johnstone, C.; Iannetta, P.P.M.; Davies, H.V. Effect of modified atmosphere packaging (MAP) on soft fruit quality. Annu. Rep. Scottish Crop Research Institute, 1999, 119-124.
- Tsao, R.; Yang, R. Optimization of a new mobile phase to know the complex and real polyphenolic composition: towards a total phenolic index using high-performance liquid chromatography. J. Chromatogr. 2003, A 1018, 29–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Re, R.; Pellegrini, N.; Proteggente, A.; Pannala, A.; Yang, M.; Rice-Evans, C. Antioxidant activity applying an improved ABTS radical cation decolorization assay. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 1999, 26, 1231–1237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Oszmiański, J.; Wojdyło, A. Effects of various clarification treatments on phenolic compounds and color of apple juice. Eur. Food Res. Technol. 2007, 224, 755–762. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dell Inc. (1984 - 2016). Dell Statistica (data analysis software system), version 13.1 software.dell.com.
- Gudkovskii, V.A.; Kozhina, L.V.; Akimov, M.Y.; Zhidekhina, T.V. Innovative storage technology of modern commercial black currant cultivars. Acta Hortic. 2020, 1277, 487–493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pluta, S.; Żurawicz, E.; Pruski, K. Suitability of fruits of selected blackcurrant (Ribes nigrum L.) cultivars for fresh market. Journal of Berry Research 2012, 2, 23–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pluta, S.; Żurawicz, E. ‘Tihope’ blackcurrant. HortScience 2015, 50, 1096–1098. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rubinskiene, M.; Viskelis, P.; Jasutiene, I.; Duchovskis, P.; Bobinas, C. Changes in biologically active constituents during ripening in black currants. Journal of Fruit and Ornamental Plant Research 2006, 14 (suppl. 2), 237–246. [Google Scholar]
- Siksnianas, T.; Stanys, V.; Sasnauskas, A.; Viskelis, P.; Rubinskiene, M. Fruit quality and processing potential in five new blackcurrant cultivars. Journal of Fruit and Ornamental Plant Research 2006, 14 (suppl. 2), 265–271. [Google Scholar]
- Sasnauskas, A.; Trajkovski, V.; Strautina, S.; Tikhonova, O.; Siksnianas, T.; Rubinskiene, M.; Viskelis, P.; Lanauskas, J.; Valiuskaite, A.; Rugienius, R.; Bobinas, C. Evaluation of blackcurrant cultivars and perspective hybrids in Lithuania. Agronomy Research 2009, 7 (special issue II), 737–743. [Google Scholar]
- Viskelis, P.; Anisimoviene, N.; Rubinskiene, M.; Jankovska, E.; Sasnauskas, A. Physical properties, antocianins and antioxidant activity of blackcurrant berries of different maturities. Journal of Food, Agriculture & Environment 2010, 8, 159–162. [Google Scholar]
- Pott, D.M.; Duran-Soria, S.; Allwood, J.W.; Pont, S.; Gordon, S.L.; Jennings, N.; Austin, C.; Stewart, D.; Brennan, R.M.; Masny, A.; Sonsteby, A.; Kruger, E.; Jarret, D.; Vallarino, J.G.; Usadel, B.; Osorio, S. Dissecting the impact of environment, season and genotype on blackcurrant fruit quality traits. Food Chemistry 2023, 402, 134360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gil, M.I.; Holcroft, D.M.; Kader, A.A. Changes in strawberry anthocyanins and other polyphenols in response to carbon dioxide treatments. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 1997, 45, 1662–1667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kevers, C.; Falkowski, M.J.; Tabart, J.; Defraigne, J.O.; Dommes, J.; Pincemail, J. Evolution of antioxidant capacity during storage of selected fruits and vegetables. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 2007, 55, 8596–8603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Van der Steen, C.; Jacxsens, L.; Devlieghere, F.; Debevere, J. Combining high oxygen atmospheres with low oxygen modified atmosphere packaging to improve the keeping quality of strawberries and raspberries. Postharvest Biology and Technology 2002, 2002 26, 49–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]




| Length of Fruit Storage in MAP | O2 (%) |
CO2 (%) |
Ethylene (ppm) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | |||
| 8 days of storage | 8.17 ±0.670 | 0.144 ±0.0101 | |
| 2022 | |||
| 13 days of storage | 12.9 ±1.15 | 9.70 ±1.054 | 0.065 ±0.0070 |
| 20 days of storage | 13.4 ±0.35 | 9.50 ±0.495 | 0.049 ±0.0070 |
| 2023 | |||
| 18 days of storage | 14.4 ±0.01 | 7.9 ±1.280 | 0.038 ±0.0035 |
| 33 days of storage | 14.4 ±0.01 | 8.6 ±0.490 | 0.028 ±0.0007 |
| Term of analyses | Storage technology | CO2 (µl/g h) |
Ethylene (µl/kg h) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Harvest | - | 27.01 ±0.26 * | 0.02 ±0.001 |
| 8 days of storage | RA CA MAP |
26.96 ±0.47 30.13 ±4.77 34.81 ±0.52 |
Not detectable Not detectable Not detectable |
| 8 days of storage + 1 day at 18 °C |
RA CA MAP |
27.58 ±0.55 28.59 ±0.75 25.98 ±5.60 |
Not detectable Not detectable Not detectable |
| 8 days of storage + 2 days at 10 °C |
RA CA MAP |
32.73 ±4.23 36.18 ±0.90 27.86 ±1.64 |
0.07 ±0.012 0.03 ±0.033 0.03 ±0.018 |
| Term of analyses | Storage technology | CO2 (µl/g h) |
Ethylene (µl/kg h) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Harvest | - | 49.37 ±1.80 | 0.05 ±0.022 |
| 13 days of storage | RA CA MAP |
37.80 ±1.08 33.27 ±4.85 34.51 ±0.60 |
0.04 ±0.017 0.02 ±0.005 0.05 ±0.010 |
| 13 days of storage + 1 day at 18 °C |
RA CA MAP |
29.51 ±4.41 32.49 ±4.46 37.44 ±1.75 |
0.04 ±0.018 0.05 ±0.022 0.07 ±0.035 |
| 13 days of storage + 2 days at 10 °C |
RA CA MAP |
27.76 ±0.26 37.67 ±5.00 26.15 ±0.74 |
0.05 ±0.029 0.06 ±0.019 0.04 ±0.004 |
| 20 days of storage | RA CA MAP |
34.25 ±0.67 26.63 ±0.81 33.37 ±4.36 |
0.10 ±0.048 0.04 ±0.013 0.08 ±0.020 |
| 20 days of storage + 1 day at 18 °C |
RA CA MAP |
25.69 ±0.51 26.63 ±0.81 27.02 ±2.32 |
0.11 ±0.054 0.11 ±0.029 0.07 ±0.057 |
| 20 days of storage + 2 days at 10 °C |
RA CA MAP |
31.71 ±5.11 28.45 ±0.86 37.62 ±6.71 |
0.13 ±0.046 0.07 ±0.038 0.11 ±0.015 |
| Term of analyses | Storage technology | CO2 (µl/g h) |
Ethylene (µl/kg h) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Harvest | - | 42.31 ±0.81 | 0.04 ±0.010 |
| 18 days of storage | RA CA MAP |
38.53 ±0.57 39.37 ±3.25 46.28 ±1.92 |
Not detectable Not detectable Not detectable |
| 18 days of storage + 1 day at 18 °C |
RA CA MAP |
28.90 ±0.43 30.24 ±3.64 39.97 ±3.64 |
0.06 ±0.036 0.03 ±0.026 0.04 ±0.022 |
| 18 days of storage + 2 days at 10 °C |
RA CA MAP |
41.80 ±5.13 35.80 ±0.90 39.30 ±5.44 |
0.04 ±0.010 0.01 ±0.015 0.09 ±0.051 |
| 33 days of storage | RA CA MAP |
34.67 ±0.30 43.24 ±0.62 43.93 ±0.49 |
0.06 ±0.018 0.02 ±0.008 0.03 ±0.001 |
| 33 days of storage + 1 day at 18 °C |
RA CA MAP |
28.90 ±5.01 31.75 ±5.40 35.14 ±0.39 |
0.10 ±0.009 0.09 ±0.014 0.16 ±0.039 |
| 33 days of storage + 2 days at 10 °C |
RA CA MAP |
- 35.75 ±1.08 41.93 ±6.21 |
- 0.04 ±0.013 0.14 ±0.022 |
| Term of analyses | Storage technology |
Firmness (N) |
TSS (%) |
TA (%) |
TSS/TA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Harvest | - | 1.43 | 16.43 | 3.72 | 4.42 |
| 8 days of storage | RA CA MAP |
1.41 a 1.47 a 1.41 a |
15.17 a 15.03 a 15.17 a |
3.86 a 3.90 a 3.76 a |
3.93 a 3.85 a 4.03 a |
| 8 days of storage + 1 day at 18 °C |
RA CA MAP |
1.11 a 1.34 b 1.31 b |
15.83 b 14.70 a 16.20 b |
3.84 a 3.83 a 3.75 a |
4.12 b 3.84 a 4.32 b |
| 8 days of storage + 2 days at 10 °C |
RA CA MAP |
1.12 a 1.43 b 1.19 a |
13.93 a 14.73 ab 15.10 b |
3.91 a 3.90 a 3.81 a |
3.56 a 3.78 ab 3.97 b |
| 14 days of storage | RA CA MAP |
0.93 a 1.71 c 1.29 b |
16.10 b 14.47 a 14.83 a |
3.75 a 3.73 a 3.83 a |
4.29 b 3.88 a 3.87 a |
| 14 days of storage + 1 day at 18 °C |
RA CA MAP |
1.15 a 1.57 b 1.20 a |
14.87 a 14.33 a 16.53 b |
3.78 a 3.82 a 3.68 a |
3.93 a 3.75 a 4.49 b |
| 14 days of storage + 2 days at 10 °C |
RA CA MAP |
1.20 a 1.64 b 1.13 a |
15.33 b 13.87 a 14.37 ab |
3.74 a 3.96 a 3.96 a |
4.10 a 3.50 a 3.64 a |
| Term of analyses | Storage technology |
Firmness (N) | TSS (%) |
TA (%) |
TSS/TA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Harvest | - | 1.87 | 13.47 | 3.65 | 3.69 |
| 13 days of storage | RA CA MAP |
1.19 a 1.71 c 1.51 b |
15.70 a 15.23 a 14.90 a |
3.31 a 3.55 b 3.63 b |
4.74 b 4.29 a 4.10 a |
| 13 days of storage + 1 day at 18 °C |
RA CA MAP |
1.08 a 1.68 b 1.01 a |
16.17 b 13.87 a 14.10 a |
3.63 a 3.62 a 3.97 b |
4.46 b 3.83 a 3.55 a |
| 13 days of storage + 2 days at 10 °C |
RA CA MAP |
1.04 a 1.36 b 1.24 b |
14.07 a 15.30 b 15.40 b |
3.70 ab 3.77 b 3.64 a |
3.80 a 4.06 b 4.23 c |
| 20 days of storage | RA CA MAP |
0.99 a 1.58 b 1.10 a |
15.40 a 13.80 a 15.17 a |
3.72 a 3.84 b 3.71 a |
4.14 b 3.59 a 4.09 b |
| 20 days of storage + 1 day at 18 °C |
RA CA MAP |
0.93 a 1.17 b 0.95 a |
15.60 a 16.23 a 15.63 a |
3.70 b 3.46 a 3.70 b |
4.22 a 4.69 b 4.22 a |
| 20 days of storage + 2 days at 10 °C |
RA CA MAP |
0.84 a 1.44 b 0.92 a |
16.33 b 15.70 b 14.77 a |
3.29 a 3.56 b 3.74 c |
4.96 c 4.41 b 3.95 a |
| Term of analyses | Storage technology |
Firmness (N) |
TSS (%) |
TA (%) |
TSS/TA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Harvest | - | 1.50 | 14.03 | 4.09 | 3.43 |
| 18 days of storage | RA CA MAP |
0.78 a 1.53 c 1.19 b |
13.90 a 14.60 b 14.80 b |
3.90 a 3.95 a 3.95 a |
3.56 a 3.69 b 3.75 b |
| 18 days of storage + 1 day at 18 °C |
RA CA MAP |
0.90 a 1.67 c 1.26 b |
14.50 a 14.03 a 14.10 a |
3.83 a 3.87 a 3.89 a |
3.79 a 3.63 a 3.63 a |
| 18 days of storage + 2 days at 10 °C |
RA CA MAP |
0.85 a 1.39 c 1.10 b |
14.27 b 14.60 b 13.77 a |
3.93 a 4.11 b 3.96 ab |
3.63 a 3.56 a 3.48 a |
| 33 days of storage | RA CA MAP |
0.54 a 1.32 b 1.41 b |
14.40 a 15.27 b 14.07 a |
3.89 b 3.68 a 3.87 b |
3.70 a 4.15 b 3.64 a |
| 33 days of storage + 1 day at 18 °C |
RA CA MAP |
0.49 a 1.19 c 0.84 b |
14.73 c 14.30 b 13.23 a |
3.89 a 3.77 a 3.80 a |
3.79 b 3.79 b 3.48 a |
| 33 days of storage + 2 days at 10 °C |
RA CA MAP |
-** 1.06 b 0.78 a |
- 14.33 b 13.47 a |
- 3.96 b 3.78 a |
- 3.62 a 3.57 a |
| Term of analyses | Storage technology |
ABTS (mg Trolox/g) |
TPC (mg/100g) |
Vitamin C (mg/100g) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Harvest | - | 7.2 ±0,01 | 330.3 ±5.86 | 146.2 ±0.83 |
| 8 days of storage | RA CA MAP |
8.4 ±0.00 8.0 ±0.07 5.2 ±0.02 |
320.4 ±4.77 333.8 ±0.08 349.7 ±5.82 |
159.1 ±5.74 158.1 ±2.50 143.9 ±1.02 |
| 8 days of storage + 1 day at 18 °C |
RA CA MAP |
8.6 ±0.14 8.9 ±0.10 9.8 ±0.01 |
314.4 ±2.31 335.7 ±3.52 357.2 ±1.02 |
134.6 ±2.59 142.9 ±3.89 140.5 ±9.54 |
| 8 days of storage + 2 days at 10 °C |
RA CA MAP |
8.2 ±0.02 8.7 ±0.06 8.1 ±0.10 |
339.0 ±2.07 374.8 ±1.33 369.8 ±3.24 |
134.9 ±0.93 147.3 ±1.20 138.0 ±1.48 |
| Term of analyses | Storage technology |
ABTS (mg Trolox/g) |
TPC (mg/100g) |
Vitamin C (mg/100g) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Harvest | - | 9.1 ±0.06 | 336.5 ±3.14 | 175.0 ±3.22 |
| 13 days of storage | RA CA MAP |
9.4 ±0.07 9.4 ±0.09 8.8 ±0.10 |
350.5 ±0.46 330.4 ±4.04 329.5 ±0.43 |
181.6 ±0.68 178.7 ±0.49 171.0 ±1.37 |
| 13 days of storage + 1 day at 18 °C |
RA CA MAP |
11.0 ±0.08 7.4 ±0.00 9.7 ±0.03 |
364.6 ±3.43 300.1 ±0.68 334.3 ±2.57 |
187.5 ±2.93 151.0 ±1.76 175.8 ±0.29 |
| 13 days of storage + 2 days at 10 °C |
RA CA MAP |
9.7 ±0.03 10.2 ±0.05 9.9 ±0.04 |
359.6 ±12.32 368.9 ±0.75 361.0 ±0.43 |
181.8 ±1.17 187.8 ±0.88 178.6 ±1.07 |
| Term of analyses | Storage technology |
ABTS (mg Trolox/g) |
TPC (mg/100g) |
Vitamin C (mg/100g) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Harvest | - | 5.7 ±0.03* | 287.3 ±0.67 | 116.7 ±2.69 |
| 33 days of storage | RA CA MAP |
6.4 ±0.06 6.7 ±0.06 7.4 ±0.01 |
299.0 ±2.25 300.2 ±1.03 331.1 ±5.10 |
114.2 ±1.37 135.2 ±3.30 131.3 ±2.41 |
| 33 days of storage + 1 day at 18 °C |
RA CA MAP |
7.0 ±0.04 6.3 ±0.03 7.0 ±0.00 |
295.9 ±2.06 283.2 ±3.56 298.2 ±3.32 |
119.8 ±3.87 108.8 ±1.03 122.5 ±0.47 |
| 33 days of storage + 2 days at 10 °C |
RA CA MAP |
-** 6.5 ±0.01 7.1 ±0.00 |
- 283.4 ±4.90 294.5 ±3.87 |
- 111.1 ±0.13 114.3 ±0.85 |
| Term of analyses | Storage technology |
Sucrose (g/kg) |
Glucose (g/kg) |
Fructose (g/kg) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Harvest | - | 11.2 ±0.23* | 22.2 ±0.07 | 34.8 ±0.11 |
| 8 days of storage | RA CA MAP |
10.3 ±0.20 11.4 ±0.12 15.0 ±0.00 |
25.7 ±0.08 25.8 ±0.04 27.7 ±0.06 |
40.0 ±0.24 40.5 ±0.02 42.7 ±0.05 |
| 8 days of storage + 1 day at 18 °C |
RA CA MAP |
12.4 ±0.25 12.4 ±0.24 11.2 ±0.14 |
23.6 ±0.21 22.3 ±0.03 25.4 ±0.14 |
38.0 ±0.64 39.3 ±0.32 39.9 ±0.00 |
| 8 days of storage + 2 days at 10 °C |
RA CA MAP |
10.3 ±0.68 11.6 ±0.07 11.5 ±0.19 |
25.9 ±0.06 25.9 ±0.48 24.9 ±0.80 |
40.5 ±0.55 40.5 ±0.81 39.1 ±0.46 |
| Term of analyses | Storage technology |
Sucrose (g/kg) |
Glucose (g/kg) |
Fructose (g/kg) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Harvest | - | 15.0 ±0.28* | 23.5 ±0.57 | 37.1 ±0.30 |
| 13 days of storage | RA CA MAP |
11.3 ±0.44 11.5 ±0.06 10.8 ±0.07 |
25.0 ±0.21 22.7 ±0.14 21.8 ±0.31 |
41.4 ±0.33 36.4 ±0.25 36.3 ±0.07 |
| 13 days of storage + 1 day at 18 °C |
RA CA MAP |
11.1 ±0.02 7.7 ±0.02 10.7 ±0.03 |
24.3 ±0.22 18.3 ±0.39 21.7 ±0.20 |
41.3 ±0.28 29.4 ±0.10 38.0 ±0.18 |
| 13 days of storage + 2 days at 10 °C |
RA CA MAP |
10.6 ±0.02 13.0 ±0.22 10.4 ±0.02 |
21.8 ±0.25 23.9 ±0.33 22.0 ±0.23 |
38.0 ±0.25 39.1 ±0.26 37.5 ±0.23 |
| Term of analyses | Storage technology |
Sucrose (g/kg) |
Glucose (g/kg) |
Fructose (g/kg) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Harvest | - | 12.5 ±0.11* | 22.6 ±0.18 | 36.0 ±0.02 |
| 33 days of storage | RA CA MAP |
7.5 ±0.03 10.0 ±0.11 11.9 ±0.05 |
22.0 ±1.32 25.6 ±0.23 26.1 ±0.13 |
37.1 ±0.12 37.9 ±0.85 42.8 ±0.31 |
| 33 days of storage + 1 day at 18 °C |
RA CA MAP |
6.5 ±0.02 8.8 ±0.05 8.6 ±0.02 |
24.4 ±0.17 22.7 ±0.20 27.1 ±0.10 |
43.9 ±0.24 36.0 ±0.34 43.0 ±0.11 |
| 33 days of storage + 2 days at 10 °C |
RA CA MAP |
-** 8.7 ±0.03 6.2 ±0.04 |
- 26.1 ±0.21 25.1 ±0.20 |
- 40.1 ±0.16 42.0 ±0.25 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
