Preprint
Article

This version is not peer-reviewed.

Polynomial Identities for Binomial Sums of Harmonic Numbers of Higher Order

A peer-reviewed article of this preprint also exists.

Submitted:

25 December 2024

Posted:

26 December 2024

You are already at the latest version

Abstract

We study the formulas for binomial sums of harmonic numbers of higher order n ∑ k=0 H (r) k  n k  (1 − q) k q n−k = H (r) n − n ∑ j=1 Dr(n, j) q j j . Recently, Mneimneh proved that D1(n, j) = 1. In this paper, we find several different expressions of Dr(n, j) for r ≥ 1.

Keywords: 
;  ;  ;  

1. Introduction

For a positive integer r, define the n-th harmonic number of order r by
H n ( r ) : = i = 1 n 1 i r .
When r = 1 , H n = H n ( 1 ) is the original harmonic number. In this paper, we study the formula
k = 0 n H k ( r ) n k ( 1 q ) k q n k = H n ( r ) j = 1 n D r ( n , j ) q j j .
In [1], for a positive integer n and 0 q 1 , it is shown that D 1 ( n , j ) = 1 . Namely,
k = 0 n H k n k ( 1 q ) k q n k = H n j = 1 n q j j .
This relation is derived by the author from an interesting probabilistic analysis. The identity (2) is a generalization of the one
k = 0 n H k n k = 2 n H n j = 1 n 1 j 2 j ,
which has been proved in [2] in the field of symbolic computation and in [3] in finite differences.
The main aim of this paper is to show several different expressions of D r ( n , j ) as no simple form has been found.
In fact, more different generalizations of (1) or (2) can be considered. For example, recently in [4], the so-called hyperharmonic number generalizes harmonic number of order r in the formula. However, when we generalize too much, we often lose the fundamental properties that make us interesting.

2. Observation

By using the harmonic numbers to express D r ( n , j ) , for 1 r 7 , we can manually get the following1.
D 1 ( n , j ) = 1 , D 2 ( n , j ) = H n H n j , D 3 ( n , j ) = ( H n H n j ) 2 2 + H n ( 2 ) H n j ( 2 ) 2 , D 4 ( n , j ) = ( H n H n j ) 3 6 + ( H n H n j ) ( H n ( 2 ) H n j ( 2 ) ) 2 + H n ( 3 ) H n j ( 3 ) 3 , D 5 ( n , j ) = ( H n H n j ) 4 4 ! + ( H n H n j ) 2 ( H n ( 2 ) H n j ( 2 ) ) 4 + ( H n H n j ) ( H n ( 3 ) H n j ( 3 ) ) 3 + ( H n ( 2 ) H n j ( 2 ) ) 2 8 + H n ( 4 ) H n j ( 4 ) 4 , D 6 ( n , j ) = ( H n H n j ) 5 5 ! + ( H n H n j ) 3 ( H n ( 2 ) H n j ( 2 ) ) 12 + ( H n H n j ) 2 ( H n ( 3 ) H n j ( 3 ) ) 6 + ( H n H n j ) ( H n ( 2 ) H n j ( 2 ) ) 2 8 + ( H n H n j ) ( H n ( 4 ) H n j ( 4 ) 4 + ( H n ( 2 ) H n j ( 2 ) ) ( H n ( 3 ) H n j ( 3 ) ) 6 + H n ( 5 ) H n j ( 5 ) 5 , D 7 ( n , j ) = ( H n H n j ) 6 6 ! + ( H n H n j ) 4 ( H n ( 2 ) H n j ( 2 ) ) 48 + ( H n H n j ) 3 ( H n ( 3 ) H n j ( 3 ) ) 18 + ( H n H n j ) 2 ( H n ( 2 ) H n j ( 2 ) ) 2 16 + ( H n H n j ) 2 ( H n ( 4 ) H n j ( 4 ) ) 8 + ( H n H n j ) ( H n ( 2 ) H n j ( 2 ) ) ( H n ( 3 ) H n j ( 3 ) ) 6 + ( H n H n j ) ( H n ( 5 ) H n j ( 5 ) ) 5 + ( H n ( 2 ) H n j ( 2 ) ) 3 48 + ( H n ( 2 ) H n j ( 2 ) ) ( H n ( 4 ) H n j ( 4 ) ) 8 + ( H n ( 3 ) H n j ( 3 ) ) 2 18 + H n ( 6 ) H n j ( 6 ) 6 .
It is interesting to observe that the number of terms of each of the right-hand sides of D r ( n , j ) is equal to the number of partitions of r ( 1 r 7 ), respectively. In addition, the same terms of generalized harmonic numbers appear in [6,7]:
n = 1 H n ( n + 1 ) ( n + 2 ) = 1 , n = 1 ( H n ) 2 H n ( 2 ) 2 ( n + 1 ) ( n + 2 ) = 1 , n = 1 ( H n ) 3 3 H n H n ( 2 ) + 2 H n ( 3 ) 3 ! ( n + 1 ) ( n + 2 ) = 1 , n = 1 ( H n ) 4 6 ( H n ) 2 H n ( 2 ) + 8 H n H n ( 3 ) + 3 ( H n ( 2 ) ) 2 6 H n ( 4 ) 4 ! ( n + 1 ) ( n + 2 ) , n = 1 1 5 ! ( n + 1 ) ( n + 2 ) ( ( H n ) 5 10 ( H n ) 3 H n ( 2 ) + 20 ( H n ) 2 H n ( 3 ) ) 2 + 15 H n ( H n ( 2 ) 30 H n H n ( 4 ) 20 H n ( 2 ) H n ( 3 ) + 24 H n ( 5 ) ) = 1 , n = 1 1 6 ! ( n + 1 ) ( n + 2 ) ( ( H n ) 6 15 ( H n ) 4 H n ( 2 ) + 40 ( H n ) 3 H n ( 3 ) + 45 ( H n ) 2 ( H n ( 2 ) ) 2 90 ( H n ) 2 H n ( 4 ) 120 H n H n ( 2 ) H n ( 3 ) + 144 H n H n ( 5 ) 15 ( H n ( 2 ) ) 3 + 90 H n ( 2 ) H n ( 4 ) + 40 ( H n ( 3 ) ) 2 120 H n ( 5 ) ) = 1 .

3. Expressions (Main Results)

Let n , j , r be positive integers.
Theorem 1.
D r ( n , j ) = l = 0 j 1 ( 1 ) j l 1 n l 1 n j n l 1 ( n l ) r 1 .
Theorem 2.
For r 1 ,
D r + 1 ( n , j ) = j 1 = 1 j j 2 = 1 j 1 j r = 1 j r 1 1 ( n j 1 + 1 ) ( n j 2 + 1 ) ( n j r + 1 ) .
D r ( n , j ) ( r 2 ) can be expressed in terms of the determinant ([8, Ch. I S 2]). See also [9,10].
Theorem 3.
D r + 1 ( n , j ) = 1 r ! H n H n j 1 0 0 H n ( 2 ) H n j ( 2 ) H n H n j 2 0 H n ( r 1 ) H n j ( r 1 ) H n ( r 2 ) H n j ( r 2 ) H n ( r 3 ) H n j ( r 3 ) r + 1 H n ( r ) H n j ( r ) H n ( r 1 ) H n j ( r 1 ) H n ( r 2 ) H n j ( r 2 ) H n H n j .
Remark 1.
By using the inversion formula (see, e.g., [11, Lemma 1],[12, Theorem 1],[8, p.28],) about (5) below, we also have
( 1 ) r 1 ( H n ( r ) H n j ( r ) ) = D 2 ( n , j ) 1 0 0 2 D 3 ( n , j ) D 2 ( n , j ) 1 0 ( r 1 ) D r ( n , j ) D r 1 ( n , j ) D r 2 ( n , j ) 1 r D r + 1 ( n , j ) D r ( n , j ) D r 1 ( n , j ) D 2 ( n , j ) .
D r ( n , j ) ( r 2 ) can be expressed by a combinatorial sum ([7, Proposition 1 (17)]):
Theorem 4.
D r + 1 ( n , j ) = i 1 + 2 i 2 + 3 i 3 + = r 1 i 1 ! i 2 ! i 3 ! H n H n j 1 i 1 H n ( 2 ) H n j ( 2 ) 2 i 2 H n ( 3 ) H n j ( 3 ) 3 i 3
Remember that the (complete exponential) Bell polynomial Y n ( x 1 , x 2 , , x n ) is defined by
exp m = 1 x m t m m ! = 1 + n = 1 Y n ( x 1 , x 2 , , x n ) t n n ! .
That is,
Y n ( x 1 , x 2 , , x n ) = k = 1 n n ! i 1 ! i 2 ! i n k + 1 ! x 1 1 ! i 1 x 2 2 ! i 2 x n k + 1 ( n k + 1 ) ! i n k + 1
with Y 0 = 1 . Here, the second sum satisfies the conditions
i 1 + 2 i 2 + 3 i 3 + + ( n k + 1 ) i n k + 1 = n , i 1 + i 2 + i 3 + = k .
Theorem 5.
For r 1 , we have
D r + 1 ( n , j ) = 1 r ! Y r H n H n j , 1 ! ( H n ( 2 ) H n j ( 2 ) ) , 2 ! ( H n ( 3 ) H n j ( 3 ) ) , .

4. Proof

Proof of Theorem 1.
We shall show
k = 0 n H k ( r ) n k ( 1 q ) k q n k = H n ( r ) j = 1 n n j l = 0 j 1 ( 1 ) j l 1 j 1 l 1 ( n l ) r q j .
We have
k = 0 n H k ( r ) n k ( 1 q ) k q n k = k = 0 n H k ( r ) n k l = 0 k ( 1 ) k l k l q n l = l = 0 n q n l n l k = l n ( 1 ) k l n l n k H k ( r ) = j = 0 n n j q j ν = 0 j ( 1 ) j ν j ν H n ν ( r ) = H n ( r ) j = 1 n ( 1 ) j 1 n j q j ν = 0 j ( 1 ) ν j ν l = 0 n 1 1 ( n l ) r .
Since
ν = 0 l ( 1 ) ν j ν = ( 1 ) l j 1 l ( proved by induction on l ( 0 ) )
and
ν = 0 j ( 1 ) ν j ν = ( 1 1 ) j = 0 ,
we have
ν = 0 j ( 1 ) ν j ν l = 0 n 1 1 ( n l ) r = l = 0 j 1 ν = 0 l ( 1 ) ν j ν 1 ( n l ) r + l = j n 1 ν = 0 j ( 1 ) ν j ν 1 ( n l ) r = l = 0 j 1 ( 1 ) l j 1 l 1 ( n l ) r .
By (3),
D r ( n , j ) = j ! n j l = 0 j 1 ( 1 ) j l 1 j 1 l 1 ( n l ) r = l = 0 j 1 ( 1 ) j l 1 n l 1 n j n l 1 ( n l ) r 1 .
Proof of Theorem 2.
By Theorem 1,
D r ( n , j ) D r ( n , j 1 ) = l = 0 j 1 ( 1 ) j l 1 n l 1 n j + n l 1 n j + 1 n l 1 ( n l ) r 1 = 1 n j + 1 l = 0 j 1 ( 1 ) j l 1 n l 1 n j n l 1 ( n l ) r 2 = D r 1 ( n , j ) n j + 1 .
Hence, by D r ( n , 0 ) = 0 we have
D r + 1 ( n , j ) = D r + 1 ( n , j 1 ) + D r ( n , j ) n j + 1 = D r + 1 ( n , j 2 ) + D r ( n , j 1 ) n j + 2 + D r ( n , j ) n j + 1 = = j 1 = 1 j D r ( n , j 1 ) n j 1 + 1 = j 1 = 1 j 1 n j 1 + 1 j 2 = 1 j 1 D r 1 ( n , j 2 ) n j 2 + 1 = j 1 = 1 j 1 n j 1 + 1 j 2 = 1 j 1 1 n j 2 + 1 j 3 = 1 j 2 D r 2 ( n , j 3 ) n j 3 + 1 = = j 1 = 1 j 1 n j 1 + 1 j 2 = 1 j 1 1 n j 2 + 1 j r = 1 j r 1 D 1 ( n , j r ) n j r + 1 = j 1 = 1 j 1 n j 1 + 1 j 2 = 1 j 1 1 n j 2 + 1 j r = 1 j r 1 1 n j r + 1 .
In order to prove Theorem 4 amd Theorem 3, we need the following relations.
Lemma 1.
For the sequences { p n } n 1 and { h n } n 1 , we have
( 1 ) n 1 p n = h 1 1 0 0 2 h 2 h 1 1 3 h 3 h 2 1 n h n h n 1 h 2 h 1 n ! h n = p 1 1 0 0 p 2 p 1 2 p 3 p 2 0 n + 1 p n p n 1 p 2 p 1 = i 1 + 2 i 2 + + n i n i 1 , i 2 , , i n 0 n ! i 1 ! i 2 ! i n ! p 1 1 i 1 p 2 2 i 2 p n n i n .
Proof. 
The last identity is a simple modification of Trudi’s formula ([13, Vol.3, p.214],[14]):
a 1 a 0 0 a 2 a 1 a n 1 a n 2 a 1 a 0 a n a n 1 a 2 a 1 = i 1 + 2 i 2 + + n t n = n ( i 1 + + i n ) ! i 1 ! i n ! ( a 0 ) n i 1 i n a 1 i 1 a 2 i 2 a n i n .
Notice that the expansion of the second determinant is equivalant to the relation
n h n = i = 1 n p i h n 1 with h 0 = 1 .
By applying the inversion formula (see, e.g. [11, Lemma 1],[12, Theorem 1]), we can get the first identity. □
Proof of Theorem 3.
The determinant in Theorem 3 is equivalent to the recurrence relation:
D r + 1 ( n , j ) = 1 r i = 1 r ( H n ( r i + 1 ) H n j ( r i + 1 ) ) D i ( n , j ) .
By applying the relation (4) in the first identity of the second part of Lemma 1 to (5), we can get the desired determinant identity. The identity of Remark can be given from the first part of Lemma 1. □
Proof of Theorem 4.
The result follows from the second part of Lemma 1 by setting h r = D r + 1 ( n , j ) and p i = H n ( i ) H n j ( i ) , satisfying (5). □
Proof of Theorem 5.
Since Bell polynomials satisfy the recurrence relation
Y r ( x 1 , x 2 , , x r ) = i = 1 r r 1 i 1 x r i + 1 Y i 1 ( x 1 , x 2 , , x i 1 )
(see, e.g., [15]), by setting x = ( 1 ) ! ( H n ( ) H n j ( ) ) , we have
1 r ! Y r H n H n j , 1 ! ( H n ( 2 ) H n j ( 2 ) ) , 2 ! ( H n ( 3 ) H n j ( 3 ) ) , = 1 r i = 1 r ( H n ( r i + 1 ) H n j ( r i + 1 ) ) × Y i 1 H n H n j , 1 ! ( H n ( 2 ) H n j ( 2 ) ) , 2 ! ( H n ( 3 ) H n j ( 3 ) ) , ( i 1 ) ! .
Since
D 2 ( n , j ) = H n H n j = Y 1 H n H n j , 1 ! ( H n ( 2 ) H n j ( 2 ) ) , 2 ! ( H n ( 3 ) H n j ( 3 ) ) , ,
for r 1 , we can write the form in Theorem 5. □

5. Some Reductions

In particular, when r = 1 in Theorem 1, we find the following relation.
Corollary 1.
l = 0 j 1 ( 1 ) j l 1 n l 1 n j n l = 1 .
When r = 2 in Theorem 1, we find the following relation. Here, ( n ) j = n ( n 1 ) ( n j + 1 ) ( j 1 ) is the falling factorial with ( n ) 0 = 1 , and n k denotes the (unsigned) Stirling number of the first kind, arising from the relation ( x ) n = k = 0 n ( 1 ) n k n k x k .
Corollary 2.
l = 0 j 1 ( 1 ) j l 1 n l 1 n j n l 1 n l = H n H n j = 1 ( n ) j ν = 0 j 1 ( 1 ) j ν 1 ( ν + 1 ) j ν + 1 n ν .
Remark 2.
Note that
n l 1 n j n l 1 n l l + 1 ( n ) j j l + 1 n l .
Proof of Corollary 2.
The formula (7) is yielded from the definition of the Stirling numbers of the first kind:
( x ) j = k = 0 j ( 1 ) j k j k x k = ν = 0 j 1 ( 1 ) j ν 1 j ν + 1 x ν + 1 ( if j 1 ) .
Differentiating both sides with respect to x gives
( x ) j l = 0 j 1 1 x l = ν = 0 j 1 ( 1 ) j ν 1 ( ν + 1 ) j ν + 1 x ν .
Thus, the right-hand side of (7) is equal to
l = 0 j 1 1 n l = H n H n j .

Author Contributions

Writing—original draft preparation, T.K., B.S.; writing—review and editing, T.K., B.S.; All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Data Availability Statement

Data are contained within the article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.
1
At first we calculated them one by one using the method in [5], but of course they can be calculated directly from the theorems described below.

References

  1. Mneimneh, S. A binomial sum of harmonic numbers. Discrete Math. 2023, 346, Article No.113075, 11 pp. [CrossRef]
  2. Paule P.; Schneider, C. Computer proofs of a new family of harmonic number identities. Adv. Appl. Math. 2003, 31, no. 2, 359–378. [CrossRef]
  3. Spivey, M. Z. Combinatorial sums and finite differences. Discrete Math. 2007, 307, 3130–3146. [CrossRef]
  4. Komatsu, T.; Wang, P. A generalization of Mneimneh’s binomial sum of harmonic numbers. Discrete Math. 2024, 347, no. 5, Article 113945, 6 pp. [CrossRef]
  5. Sury, B. Sum of the reciprocals of the binomial coefficients. Eur. J. Comb. 1993, no. 4, 14, 351–353. [CrossRef]
  6. Choi, J. Summation formulas involving binomial coefficients, harmonic numbers, and generalized harmonic numbers. Abst. Appl. Anal. 2014, 2014, Article 501906, 10 pp.
  7. Hoffman, M. E. Harmonic-number summation identities, symmetric functions, and multiple zeta values. Ramanujan J. 2017, 42, no.2, 501–526. [CrossRef]
  8. MacDonald, I. G. Symmetric Functions and Hall Polynomials. 2nd ed., Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1995.
  9. Chen X.; Chu, W. The Gauss 2F1(1)-summation theorem and harmonic number identities. Integral Transforms Spec. Funct. 2009, 20, 925–935.
  10. Coppo M.; Candelpergher, B. The Arakawa-Kaneko zeta function. Ramanujan J. 2010, 22, 153–162.
  11. Komatsu, T. Bernoulli numbers with level 2. Aequat. Math. 2024, online first. [CrossRef]
  12. Komatsu T.; Ramirez, J. L. Some determinants involving incomplete Fubini numbers. An. Ştiinţ. Univ. “Ovidius” Constanţa Ser. Mat. 2018, 26 no.3, 143–170. [CrossRef]
  13. Muir, T. The theory of determinants in the historical order of development. Four volumes, Dover Publications, New York, 1960.
  14. Trudi, N. Intorno ad alcune formole di sviluppo. Rendic. dell’ Accad. Napoli 1862, 135–143.
  15. Comtet, L. Advanced combinatorics. Dordrecht, D. Reidel Publishing Company, 1974.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
Copyright: This open access article is published under a Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 license, which permit the free download, distribution, and reuse, provided that the author and preprint are cited in any reuse.
Prerpints.org logo

Preprints.org is a free preprint server supported by MDPI in Basel, Switzerland.

Subscribe

Disclaimer

Terms of Use

Privacy Policy

Privacy Settings

© 2026 MDPI (Basel, Switzerland) unless otherwise stated