Submitted:
30 November 2023
Posted:
01 December 2023
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
Keywords:
1. Introduction
2. The Use of Trichoderma Fungi in the Pre-treatment of Lignocellulosic Biomass
2.1. Structure and Composition of Lignocellulosic Biomass
2.2. Methods of Pre-treatment of Lignocellulosic Biomass
2.3. Application of Trichoderma Fungi in the Pre-treatment of Lignocellulosic Biomass
3. The Use of Digestate as an Organic Carrier for the Multiplication of Trichoderma Fungi
3.1. Structure and Composition of Digestate
3.2. Application of Trichoderma Fungi to the Digestate
4. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Owusu, P.A.; Asumadu-Sarkodie, S. A review of renewable energy sources, sustainability issues and climate change mitigation. Cogent Eng. 2016, 3, 1167990.
- Majeed, Y.; Khan, M.U.; Waseem, M.; Zahid, U.; Mahmood, F.; Majeed, F.; Sultan, M.; Raza, A. Renewable energy as an alternative source for energy management in agriculture. Energy Rep. 2023, 10, 344–359. [CrossRef]
- Bharathiraja, B.; Sudharsana, T.; Jayamuthunagai, J.; Praveenkumar, R.; Chozhavendhan, S.; Iyyappan, J. Biogas production–A review on composition, fuel properties, feed stock and principles of anaerobic digestion. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2018, 90, 570–582. [CrossRef]
- Alalwan, H.A.; Alminshid, A.H.; Aljaafari, H.A.S. Promising Evolution of Biofuel Generations. Subject Review. Renew. Energy Focus 2019, 28, 127–139. [CrossRef]
- Martins, F.; Felgueiras, C.; Smitková, M. Fossil fuel energy consumption in European countries. Energy Procedia 2018, 153, 107–111. [CrossRef]
- Martins, F.; Felgueiras, C.; Smitkova, M.; Caetano, N. Analysis of Fossil Fuel Energy Consumption and Environmental Impacts in European Countries. Energies 2019, 12, 964. [CrossRef]
- Sayed, E.T.; Olabi, A.G.; Alami, A.H.; Radwan, A.; Mdallal, A.; Rezk, A.; Abdelkareem, M.A. Renewable Energy and Energy Storage Systems. Energies 2023, 16, 1415. [CrossRef]
- Perera, F.P. Multiple threats to child health from fossil fuel combustion: Impacts of air pollution and climate change. Environ. Health Perspect. 2017, 125, 141–148. [CrossRef]
- Perera, F. Pollution from Fossil-Fuel Combustion is the Leading Environmental Threat to Global Pediatric Health and Equity: Solutions Exist. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2018, 15, 16. [CrossRef]
- Communication from the Commmission to the European Parliament, The European Council, The Council, The European Economic and Social Commmittee and The Commmittee of the Regions, The European Green Deal. European Commission: Brussels, Belgium, 2019. Available online: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=COM%3A2019%3A640%3AFIN (accessed on 29 october 2023).
- Gajdzik, B.; Wolniak, R.; Nagaj, R.; Grebski, W.W.; Romanyshyn, T. Barriers to Renewable Energy Source (RES) Installations as Determinants of Energy Consumption in EU Countries. Energies 2023, 16, 7364. [CrossRef]
- Mohtasham, J. Review article-renewable energies. Energy Procedia 2015, 74, 1289–1297. [CrossRef]
- Pavar, V.; Farooqui, S. The effectiveness of renewable energy technologies in reducing greenhouse gas emissions. South India Journal Of Social Sciences 2023, 21, 150-160.
- Eurostat. European Statistics Explained. Renewable Energy Statistic. Share of renewable energy more than doubled between 2004 and 2021. 2023. Available online: https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php?title=Renewable_energy_statistics#Share_of_renewable_energy_more_than_doubled_between_2004_and_2020 (accessed on 29 october 2023).
- Communication from the Commmission to the European Parliament, The European Council, The Council, The European Economic and Social Commmittee and The Commmittee of the Regions, REPowerEU Plan. European Commission: Brussels, Belgium, 2022. Available online: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=COM%3A2022%3A230%3AFIN (accessed on 29 october 2023).
- Commission welcomes completion of key ‘Fit for 55' legislation, putting EU on track to exceed 2030 targets. European Commission: Brussels, Belgium, 2023. Available online: https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/ip_23_4754 (accessed on 29 october 2023).
- Regulation (EU) 2021/1119 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 June 2021 establishing the framework for achieving climate neutrality and amending Regulations (EC) No 401/2009 and (EU) 2018/1999 (‘European Climate Law’). Official Journal of the European Union, Brussels, Belgium, 2021. Available online: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:32021R1119 (accessed on 29 october 2023).
- Paris Agreement. Official Journal of the European Union, Brussels, Belgium, 2016. Available online: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:22016A1019(01) (accessed on 29 october 2023).
- Notton, G.; Nivet, M.-L.; Voyant, C.; Paoli, C.; Darras, C.; Motte, F.; Fouilloy, A. Intermittent and stochastic character of renewable energy sources: Consequences, cost of intermittence and benefit of forecasting. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2018, 87, 96–105. [CrossRef]
- Mignogna, D.; Ceci, P.; Cafaro, C.; Corazzi, G.; Avino, P. Production of Biogas and Biomethane as Renewable Energy Sources: A Review. Appl. Sci. 2023, 13, 10219. [CrossRef]
- Pfau, S.F.; Hagens, J.E.; Dankbaar, B. Biogas between renewable energy and bio-economy policies—Opportunities and constraints resulting from a dual role. Energy Sustain. Soc. 2017, 7, 17. [CrossRef]
- Manyi-Loh, C.E.; Lues, R. Anaerobic Digestion of Lignocellulosic Biomass: Substrate Characteristics (Challenge) and Innovation. Fermentation 2023, 9, 755. [CrossRef]
- Pilarska, A.A.; Marzec-Grządziel, A.; Paluch, E.; Pilarski, K.; Wolna-Maruwka, A.; Kubiak, A.; Kałuża, T.; Kulupa, T. Biofilm Formation and Genetic Diversity of Microbial Communities in Anaerobic Batch Reactor with Polylactide (PLA) Addition. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 10042. [CrossRef]
- Shrestha, S.; Fonoll, X.; Khanal, S.K.; Raskin, L. Biological Strategies for Enhanced Hydrolysis of Lignocellulosic Biomass during Anaerobic Digestion: Current Status and Future Perspectives. Bioresour. Technol. 2017, 245, 1245–1257. [CrossRef]
- Awasthi, M.K.; Sarsaiya, S.; Patel, A.; Juneja, A.; Singh, R.P.; Yan, B.; Awasthi, S.K.; Jain, A.; Liu, T.; Duan, Y.; et al. Refining biomass residues for sustainable energy and bio-products: An assessment of technology, its importance, and strategic applications in circular bio-economy. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2020, 127, 109876. [CrossRef]
- Olatunji, K.O.; Ahmed, N.A.; Ogunkunle, O. Optimization of biogas yield from lignocellulosic materials with different pretreatment methods: A review. Biotechnol. Biofuels 2021, 14, 159. [CrossRef]
- Kumar Khanal, S.; Lü, F.; Wong, J.W.C.; Wu, D.; Oechsner, H. Anaerobic digestion beyond biogas. Bioresour. Technol. 2021, 337, 125378. [CrossRef]
- Pilarska, A.A.; Pilarski, K.; Waliszewska, B.; Zborowska, M.; Witaszek, K.; Waliszewska, H.; Kolasiński, M.; Szwarc-Rzepka, K. Evaluation of bio-methane yields for high-energy organic waste and sewage sludge: Apilot-scale study for a wastewater treatment plant. Environ. Eng. Manag. J. 2019, 18, 2023–2034.
- Meegoda, J.N.; Li, B.; Patel, K.; Wang, L.B. A Review of the Processes, Parameters, and Optimization of Anaerobic Digestion. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2018, 15, 2224.
- Kougias, P.G.; Angelidaki, I. Biogas and its opportunities - A review Keywords. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng. 2018, 12, 1–22.
- Náthia-Neves, G.; Berni, M.; Dragone, G.; Mussatto, S.I.; Forster-Carneiro, T. Anaerobic digestion process: Technological aspects and recent developments. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2018, 15, 2033–2046. [CrossRef]
- Gerardi, M.H. Wastewater Microbiology Series: The Microbiology of Anaerobic Digesters; Wiley: New York, NY, USA, 2003.
- Atelge, M.; Krisa, D.; Kumar, G.; Eskicioglu, C.; Nguyen, D.D.; Chang, S.W.; Atabani, A.; Al-Muhtaseb, A.H.; Unalan, S. Biogas production from organic waste: Recent progress and perspectives. Waste Biomass Valorization 2018, 11, 1019–1040. [CrossRef]
- Yilmaz, A.; Ünvar, S.; Koçer, A.; Aygün, B. Factors affecting the production of biogas. Int. J. Sci. Eng. Res. 2018, 9, 59–62.
- Nsair, A.; Onen Cinar, S.; Alassali, A.; Abu Qdais, H.; Kuchta, K. Operational Parameters of Biogas Plants: A Review and Evaluation Study. Energies 2020, 13, 3761. [CrossRef]
- Pilarska, A.A.; Kulupa, T.; Kubiak, A.; Wolna-Maruwka, A.; Pilarski, K.; Niewiadomska, A. Anaerobic Digestion of Food Waste—A Short Review. Energies 2023, 16, 5742. [CrossRef]
- Angelidaki, I.; Treu, L.; Tsapekos, P.; Luo, G.; Campanaro, S.; Wenzel, H.; Kougias, P.G. Biogas upgrading and utilization: Current status and perspectives. Biotechnol. Adv. 2018, 36, 452–466. [CrossRef]
- Kabeyi, M.J.B.; Olanrewaju, O.A. Biogas Production and Applications in the Sustainable Energy Transition. Energy 2022, 2022, 8750221. [CrossRef]
- Kumar, S.; Shilpi; Singh, S. Biogas as a Powerhouse of Renewable Energy: A Review. J. Adv. Res. in Alternative Energy, Environment and Ecology, 2023, 10, 1-5.
- Koupaie, E.H.; Dahadha, S.; Lakeh, A.A.B.; Azizi, A.; Elbeshbishy, E. Enzymatic pretreatment of lignocellulosic biomass for enhanced biomethane production-A review. J. Environ. Manag. 2019, 233, 774–784. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.09.106.
- Ometto, F.; Karlsson, A.; Ejlertsson, J.; Björn, A.V.; Shakeri, S.Y. Anaerobic digestion: An engineered biological process. In Substitute Natural Gas from Waste; Materazzi, M., Foscolo, P.U., Eds.; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2019; pp. 63–74. [CrossRef]
- Abraham, A.; Mathew, A.; Park, H.; Choi, O.; Sindhu, R.; Parameswaran, B.; Pandey, A.; Park, J.; Sang, B. Pretreatment strategies for enhanced biogas production from lignocellulosic biomass. Bioresour. Technol. 2020, 301, 122725. [CrossRef]
- Xu, N.; Liu, S.; Xin, F.; Zhou, J.; Jia, H.; Xu, J.; Jiang, M.; Don, W. Biomethane Production from Lignocellulose: Biomass Recalcitrance and Its Impacts on Anaerobic Digestion. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 2019, 7, 191. [CrossRef]
- Agregán, R.; Lorenzo, J.M.; Kumar, M.; Shariati, M.A.; Khan, M.U.; Sarwar, A.; Sultan, M.; Rebezov, M.; Usman, M. Anaerobic Digestion of Lignocellulose Components: Challenges and Novel Approaches. Energies 2022, 15, 8413. [CrossRef]
- Witaszek, K.; Pilarski, K.; Niedbała, G.; Pilarska, A.A.; Herkowiak, M. Energy Efficiency of Comminution and Extrusion of Maize Substrates Subjected to Methane Fermentation. Energies 2020, 13, 1887. [CrossRef]
- Wagner, A.O.; Schwarzenauer, T.; Illmer, P. Improvement of methane generation capacity by aerobic pre-treatment of organic waste with a cellulolytic Trichoderma viride culture. J. Environ. Manag. 2013, 129, 357–360. [CrossRef]
- Zulkifli, Z.B.; Rasit, N.B.; Umor, N.A.; Ismail, S. The effect of A. Fumigatus SK1 and Trichoderma sp. on the biogas production from cow manure. Malays. J. Fundam. Appl. Sci. 2018, 14, 353–359. [CrossRef]
- Mahmoud, Y. G.; Awadalla, O. A.; Estafanous, A. N.; Etawy, W. A. The use of Phanerochaete chrysosporium, Trichoderma harzianum and Trichoderma viride for biogas production. Studies in Fungi 2020, 5, 368-380.
- Sharma, S.; Kour, D.; Rana, K.L.; Dhiman, A.; Thakur, S.; Thakur, P.; Thakur, S.; Thakur, N.; Sudheer, S.; Yadav, N.; et al. Trichoderma: Biodiversity, ecological significances, and industrial applications. In Recent Advancement in White Biotechnology through Fungi; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2019; pp. 85–120.
- Japanis, F.G.; Vetaryan, S.; Raja, N.K.K.; Mokhtar, M.A.A.; Mohd Fishal, E.M. The Impact of Trichoderma spp. on Agriculture and Their Identification. MAB 2022, 51, 1–15. [CrossRef]
- Zin, N.A.; Badaluddin, N.A. Biological functions of Trichoderma spp. for agriculture applications. Ann. Agric. Sci. 2020, 65, 168–178. [CrossRef]
- Tyśkiewicz, R.; Nowak, A.; Ozimek, E.; Jaroszuk-Ściseł, J. Trichoderma: The Current Status of Its Application in Agriculture for the Biocontrol of Fungal Phytopathogens and Stimulation of Plant Growth. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 2329. [CrossRef]
- Kubiak, A.; Wolna-Maruwka, A.; Pilarska, A.A.; Niewiadomska, A.; Piotrowska-Cyplik, A. Fungi of the Trichoderma Genus: Future Perspectives of Benefits in Sustainable Agriculture. Appl. Sci. 2023, 13, 6434. [CrossRef]
- Alias, C.; Bulgari, D.; Gobbi, E. It Works! Organic-Waste-Assisted Trichoderma spp. Solid-State Fermentation on Agricultural Digestate. Microorganisms 2022, 10, 164. [CrossRef]
- Bulgari, D.; Alias, C.; Peron, G.; Ribaudo, G.; Gianoncelli, A.; Savino, S.; Boureghda, H.; Bouznad, Z.; Monti, E.; Gobbi, E. Solid-State Fermentation of Trichoderma spp.: A New Way to Valorize the Agricultural Digestate and Produce Value-Added Bioproducts. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2023, 71, 3994–4004. [CrossRef]
- Czekała, W.; Jasinski, T.; Grzelak, M.; Witaszek, K.; Dach, J. Biogas Plant Operation: Digestate as the Valuable Product. Energies 2022, 15, 8275. [CrossRef]
- Paul, S.; Dutta, A. Challenges and Opportunities of Lignocellulosic Biomass for Anaerobic Digestion. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2018, 130, 164–174. [CrossRef]
- Sawatdeenarunat, C.; Surendra, K.C.; Takara, D.; Oechsner, H.; Khanal, S.K. Anaerobic digestion of lignocellulosic biomass: Challenges and opportunities. Bioresour. Technol. 2015, 178, 178–186. [CrossRef]
- Hernández-Beltrán, J.U.; Hernández-De Lira, I.O.; Cruz-Santos, M.M.; Saucedo-Luevanos, A.; Hernández-Terán, F.; Balagurusamy, N. Insight into Pretreatment Methods of Lignocellulosic Biomass to Increase Biogas Yield: Current State, Challenges, and Opportunities. Appl. Sci. 2019, 9, 3721. [CrossRef]
- Bajpai, P. Structure of Lignocellulosic Biomass. In Pretreatment of Lignocellulosic Biomass for Biofuel Production; Springer: Singapore, 2016; pp. 7–12.
- Surendra, K.C.; Ogoshi, R.; Zaleski, H.M.; Hashimoto, A.G.; Khanal, S.K. High yielding tropical energy crops for bioenergy production: Effects of plant components, harvest years and locations on biomass composition. Bioresour. Technol. 2018, 251, 218–229. [CrossRef]
- Kainthola, J.; Podder, A.; Fechner, M.; Goel, R. An Overview of Fungal Pretreatment Processes for Anaerobic Digestion: Applications, Bottlenecks and Future Needs. Bioresour. Technol. 2021, 321, 124397. [CrossRef]
- Zheng, Y.; Zhao, J.; Xu, F.; Li, Y. Pretreatment of lignocellulosic biomass for enhanced biogas production. Prog. Energy Combust. Sci. 2014, 42, 35–53. [CrossRef]
- Scheller, H.V.; Ulvskov, P. Hemicelluloses. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2010, 61, 263–289.
- Zhou, X.; Li, W.; Mabon, R.; Broadbelt, L.J. A critical review on hemicellulose pyrolysis. Energy Technol. 2017, 5, 52–79. [CrossRef]
- Li, F.; Zhang, M.; Guo, K.; Hu, Z.; Zhang, R.; Feng, Y.; Yi, X.; Zou, W.; Wang, L.; Wu, C. High-level hemicellulosic arabinose predominately affects lignocellulose crystallinity for genetically enhancing both plant lodging resistance and biomass enzymatic digestibility in rice mutants. Plant Biotechnol. J. 2015, 13, 514–525. [CrossRef]
- Shahzadi, T.; Mehmood, S.; Irshad, M.; Anwar, Z.; Afroz, A.; Zeeshan, N.; Rashid, U.; Sughra, K. Advances in lignocellulosic biotechnology: A brief review on lignocellulosic biomass and cellulases. Adv. Biosci. Biotechnol. 2014, 5, 246–251. [CrossRef]
- Meenakshisundaram, S.; Fayeulle, A.; Léonard, E.; Ceballos, C.; Liu, X.; Pauss, A. Combined Biological and Chemical/Physicochemical Pretreatment Methods of Lignocellulosic Biomass for Bioethanol and Biomethane Energy Production—A Review. Appl. Microbiol. 2022, 2, 716–734. [CrossRef]
- Sawatdeenarunat, C.; Surendra, K.C.; Takara, D.; Oechsner, H.; Khanal, S.K. Anaerobic digestion of lignocellulosic biomass: Challenges and opportunities. Bioresour. Technol. 2015, 178, 178–186. [CrossRef]
- Paudel, S.R.; Banjara, S.P.; Choi, O.K.; Park, K.Y.; Kim, Y.M.; Lee, J.W. Pretreatment of Agricultural Biomass for Anaerobic Digestion: Current State and Challenges. Bioresour. Technol. 2017, 245, 1194–1205. [CrossRef]
- Poddar, B.J.; Nakhate, S.P.; Gupta, R.K.; Chavan, A.R.; Singh, A.K.; Khardenavis, A.A.; Purohit, H.J. A Comprehensive Review on the Pretreatment of Lignocellulosic Wastes for Improved Biogas Production by Anaerobic Digestion. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2021, 19, 3429–3456. [CrossRef]
- Sun, S.; Sun, S.; Cao, X.; Sun, R. The Role of Pretreatment in Improving the Enzymatic Hydrolysis of Lignocellulosic Materials. Bioresour. Technol. 2016, 199, 49–58.
- Rajendran, K.; Drielak, E.; Varma, V.S.; Muthusamy, S.; Kumar, G. Updates on the Pretreatment of Lignocellulosic Feedstocks for Bioenergy Production—A Review. Biomass Convers. Biorefinery 2018, 8, 471–483. [CrossRef]
- Mustafa, A.M.; Poulsen, T.G.; Sheng, K. Fungal Pretreatment of Rice Straw with Pleurotus Ostreatus and Trichoderma Reesei to Enhance Methane Production under Solid-State Anaerobic Digestion. Appl. Energy 2016, 180, 661–671. [CrossRef]
- Deng, Y.; Dai, B.; Xu, J.; Liu, X.; Xu, J. Anaerobic co-digestion of rice straw and soybean straw to increase biogas production by pretreatment with Trichoderma reesei RUT C30. Environ. Prog. Sustain. Energy 2018, 37, 1050–1057. [CrossRef]
- Kovács, E.; Szűcs, C.; Farkas, A.; Szuhaj, M.; Maróti, G.; Bagi, Z.; Rákhely, G.; Kovács, K.L. Pretreatment of Lignocellulosic Biogas Substrates by Filamentous Fungi. J. Biotechnol. 2022, 360, 160–170. [CrossRef]
- Ilo, O. P.; Nkomo, S. P. L.; Mkhize, N. M.; Mutanga, O.; Simatele, M. D. The effects of Trichoderma atroviride pretreatment on the biogas production from anaerobic digestion of water hyacinth. Energy & Environment, 2022, 0958305X221141397. [CrossRef]
- Mutschlechner, M.; Illmer, P.; Wagner, A.O. Biological pre-treatment: Enhancing biogas production using the highly cellulolytic fungus Trichoderma viride. Waste Manag. 2015, 43, 98–107. [CrossRef]
- Zhao, X.; Zheng, Z.; Cai, Y.; Zhao, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Gao, Y.; Cui, Z.; Wang, X. Accelerated biomethane production from lignocellulosic biomass: Pretreated by mixed enzymes secreted by Trichoderma viride and Aspergillus sp. Bioresour. Technol. 2020, 309, 123378. [CrossRef]
- Czekała, W.; Dach, J.; Dong, R.; Janczak, D.; Malińska, K.; Jóźwiakowski, K.; Smurzyńska, A.; Cieślik, M. Composting potential of the solid fraction of digested pulp produced by a biogas plant. Biosyst. Eng. 2017, 160, 25–29. [CrossRef]
- Logan, M.; Visvanathan, C. Management strategies for anaerobic digestate of organic fraction of municipal solid waste: Current status and future prospects. Waste Manag. Res. 2019, 37 (Suppl. S1), 27–39. [CrossRef]
- Monlau, F.; Sambusiti, C.; Ficara, E.; Aboulkas, A.; Barakat, A.; Carrere, H. New opportunities for agricultural digestate valorization: Current situation and perspectives. Energy Environ. Sci. 2015, 8, 2600–2621. [CrossRef]
- Lamolinara, B.; Pérez-Martínez, A.; Guardado-Yordi, E.; Guillén Fiallos, C.; Diéguez-Santana, K.; Ruiz-Mercado, G.J. Anaerobic Digestate Management, Environmental Impacts, and Techno-Economic Challenges. Waste Manag. 2022, 140, 14–30. [CrossRef]
- Koszel, M.; Kocira, A.; Lorencowicz, E. The evaluation of the use of biogas plant digestate as a fertilizer in alfalfa and spring wheat cultivation. Fresenius Environ. Bull. 2016, 25, 3258–3264.
- Panuccio, M.R.; Papalia, T.; Attinà, E.; Giuffrè, A.M.; Muscolo, A. Use of digestate as an alternative to mineral fertilizer: effects on growth and crop quality. Arch. Agron. Soil Sci. 2019, 65, 700–711. [CrossRef]
- Panuccio, M.R.; Mallamaci, C.; Attinà, E.; Muscolo, A. Using Digestate as Fertilizer for a Sustainable Tomato Cultivation. Sustainability 2021, 13, 1574. [CrossRef]
- Tiwary, A.; Williams, I.D.; Pant, D.C.; Kishore, V.V.N. Emerging Perspectives on Environmental Burden Minimisation Initiatives from Anaerobic Digestion Technologies for Community Scale Biomass Valorisation. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2015, 42, 883–901. [CrossRef]
- Wang, W.; Lee, D.J. Valorization of anaerobic digestion digestate: A prospect review. Bioresour. Technol. 2020, 323, 124626. [CrossRef]
- Kubiak, A.; Wolna-Maruwka, A.; Niewiadomska, A.; Pilarska, A.A. The Problem of Weed Infestation of Agricultural Plantations vs. the Assumptions of the European Biodiversity Strategy. Agronomy 2022, 12, 1808. [CrossRef]
- Bulgari, D.; Alias, C.; Peron, G.; Ribaudo, G.; Gianoncelli, A.; Savino, S.; Boureghda, H.; Bouznad, Z.; Monti, E.; Gobbi, E. Solid-State Fermentation of trichoderma spp.: A New Way to Valorize the Agricultural Digestate and Produce Value-Added Bioproducts. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2023, 71, 3994–4004. [CrossRef]
- Alias, C.; Bulgari, D.; Gobbi, E. It Works! Organic-Waste-Assisted Trichoderma spp. Solid-State Fermentation on Agricultural Digestate. Microorganisms 2022, 10, 164. [CrossRef]
- Bulgari, D.; Renzetti, S.; Messgo-Moumene, S.; Monti, E.; Gobbi, E. Optimization of Esterase Production in Solid-State Fermentation of Agricultural Digestate. Fermentation 2023, 9, 524. [CrossRef]
- Escamilla-Alvarado, C.; Poggi-Varaldo, H.; Ponce-Noyola, M. Use of organic waste for the production of added-value holocellulases with Cellulomonas flavigena PR-22 and Trichoderma reesei MCG 80. Waste Management & Research 2013, 31, 849–858. [CrossRef]


| Species of Trichoderma | Biogas or biomethane yield | References |
|---|---|---|
| Trichoderma atroviride | biogas yield: 223.4 mL/g VS biogas yield in control: 135 mL/g VS methane yield: 200 mL/g VS methane yield in control: 91.84 mL/g VS |
[77] |
| Trichoderma viride | methane yield: 419.63 mL/g TS methane yield in control: 389.13 mL/g TS |
[79] |
| Trichoderma viride | biogas yield: 100.79 mL/g VS biogas yield in control: 66.16 mL/g VS methane yield: 23.42 mL/g VS methane yield in control: 11.41 mL/g VS |
[46] |
| Trichoderma viride | biogas yield: 150.19 mL/g VS biogas yield in control: 66.16 mL/g VS methane yield: 47.36 mL/g VS methane yield in control: 11.41 mL/g VS |
[46] |
| Trichoderma viride | biogas yield: 703.7 mL/g VS biogas yield in control: 379.5 mL/g VS methane yield: 356.1 mL/g VS methane yield in control: 194.4 mL/g VS |
[78] |
| Trichoderma viride | biogas yield: 790 mL/g VS biogas yield in control: 553.7 mL/g VS methane yield: 447.7 mL/g VS methane yield in control: 314.12 mL/g VS |
[78] |
| Trichoderma viride | biogas yield: 840.9 mL/g VS biogas yield in control: 367.4 mL/g VS methane yield: 439.5 mL/g VS methane yield in control: 133.3 mL/g VS |
[78] |
| Trichoderma viride | biogas yield: 1299.4 mL/g VS biogas yield in control: 688.3 mL/g VS methane yield: 722.6 mL/g VS methane yield in control: 312.3 mL/g VS |
[78] |
| Trichoderma reesei | methane yield: 91.6 NmL/g TS methane yield in control: 9.4 NmL/g TS |
[75] |
| Trichoderma reesei | methane yield: 90.1 NmL/g TS methane yield in control: 9.2 NmL/g TS |
[75] |
| Trichoderma reesei | methane yield: 94.3 NmL/g TS methane yield in control: 10.4 NmL/g TS |
[75] |
| Trichoderma reesei | methane yield: 214 L/Kg Vs methane yield in control: 127 L/Kg Vs |
[74] |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
