1. Introduction
Einstein said about thermodynamics: "A theory is the more impressive the greater the simplicity of its premises is, the more different kinds of things it relates, and the more extended is its area of applicability. Therefore, the deep impression which classical thermodynamics made upon me. It is the only physical theory of universal content concerning which I am convinced that within the framework of the applicability of its basic concepts, it will never be overthrown." [
1]
Entropy is a measure of the disorder or randomness of a system. According to the second law of thermodynamics, the entropy of an isolated system increases over time, or at best remains constant. This law gives time a fundamental direction, often referred to as the 'arrow of time'.
A major challenge in the standard cosmological model is explaining why the universe began its expansion with abnormally low entropy, which then increased dramatically to reach values much higher than those observed at decoupling (approximately 380,000 years after the Big Bang). This 'initial entropy problem' appears to contradict the observed cosmic microwave background (CMB), which indicates that the early universe was close to thermal and chemical equilibrium, a state typically associated with high entropy.
Assuming our universe is an isolated system at the temperature of the CMB and based on recent thermodynamic cosmology research of the Rh = ct type, we propose a formula for the entropy of our universe that is consistent with its energy at the apparent horizon.
2. Background
In 2015, Tatum et al. [
2] proposed an equation for the CMB temperature, noted
, that has since been formally derived from the Stefan-Boltzmann law by Haug and Wojnow [
3,
4].
Witch can be derived as follows:
Where ℏ is the reduced Planck constant, is the speed of light in a vacuum, is Boltzmann's constant, the Hubble radius is defined by where is the Hubble parameter, is the temperature of the Hubble sphere, is the Planck length, is the Hubble time defined by , and is the Planck time.
From Eq.2 we derive directly:
These values, together with Planck's energy, , where is Planck's mass, are necessary and sufficient to lead us to the formulation of the entropy of the apparent universe, i.e. at the Hubble radius, compatible with the energy contained in the Hubble sphere.
Note: It should be noted that Eq.1 is an adaptation of the Hawking temperature of black holes[
2]. This leads to the idea that our universe is the interior of an expanding black hole and that, in thermodynamic cosmology, an isolated system can also be linked to the interior of a black hole. Thus, our universe is a simple part of an infinite flat universe populated by black holes, which themselves contain their own universes.
3. Heuristic Formulation of the Entropy of Our Apparent Universe
First, we are in the field of classical thermodynamic cosmological models, so the energy contained in the Hubble sphere, , where is the gravitational constant, must be equal to in our model.
For example, in Haug and Tatum's approach to the entropy of our apparent universe, the energy
is correct at Planck temperature, which should be noted, but diverges, by a factor of
today, in our model when it is applied naively to the temperature of Hubble sphere as follows:
. This is incorrect because we don't respect the law of conservation of energy which imposes:
We must present our apologies to Haug and Tatum here. Indeed, in previous versions I had not found their version, see [
5], how they arrive at the law of the conservation of energy which is correct is equivalent to our (see Annex A). Their formula is as follows, see [
8],
, with
, i.e. independent of
, and
.
The entropy
proposed by Haug and Tatum [
5], although logically incorrect for all
in classical mechanics when it is applied naively to the temperature of Hubble sphere, has the advantage of being correct at Planck temperature. They assumed in Rh=ct cosmology the Bekenstein-Hawking formula for the entropy of a black hole as follows:
We have noticed that the geometric means are commonly used in our particular approach to Rh=ct thermodynamic cosmological models [
2,
6], between unit quantum values and Rh=ct model values.
We therefore replaced
with
to preserve the exact result at Planck temperature, when
. Despite this modification,
still diverged from
for more contemporary values of
. We then applied the principle of the ratio of quantum values to values in the Rh = c t model to count the number of Planck units. For example [
7],
. When
was sufficiently close to
, we searched for constants, particularly simple powers of π, to arrive at this formula for the entropy of the apparent universe, which is compatible with its energy at the CMB temperature
With
and
Eq.5, i.e. the formula of cosmic entropy in this Rh = c t model, can simplify as follows:
It is important to emphasize and remember that, in this approach,
and
Then we can verify numerically
, i.e. the law of energy conservation:
As decreases, the cosmic entropy of the universe increases. The temperature and the entropy of universe are transformed into Hubble volume and Hubble mass (i.e. energy). This is a global state change in the temperature of the universe, which simultaneously affects its volume and mass (i.e. energy).
4. Demonstration of This Formula for Cosmic Entropy in This Model Rh=ct
With
we derive Eq.11 as follows:
With
and
we derive Eq.12 as follows:
Since we have shown that to satisfy the law of the conservation of energy in the Rh=ct model thanks to the formulas of and .
5. Contribution of the Entropy to Duration and Energy in the Planck Era
It is widely accepted that the Planck era is characterized by Planck energy and Planck temperature. However, the concept of time in the Planck era is poorly defined. By setting , we calculate , i.e. a time shorter than the Planck time at Planck era. In an other hand, we also can calculate in this model that for , we need to set .
6. Conclusion
The contribution of the universe entropy formula Rh=ct to this emerging quantum thermodynamic cosmological model is an important advance. It provides a reliable formula in this field of research, paving the way for new developments and perspectives on the issues faced by the contemporary standard cosmological model. Indeed, there is a potential link between the models and the cosmological standard model with the formula of observable radius: This could precision and refine the standard cosmological model.
7. Acknowledgments
The author would like to express his sincere thanks to Eugene Terry Tatum for his review on the first version of this article. He would also like to express his sincere thanks to Espen Haug for having presented to me their complete version of the conservation of energy at the apparent horizon [8] and stimulating exchange of mails.
Annex A: Demonstration of Equivalence of These Two Different Approaches
Haug, Tatum formula for the Hubble sphere is as follows [
8]:
Witch can be simplified as follows:
Witch can be rearranged as follows:
With
and
we derive Eq.A.4 as follows:
Witch can be simplified as follows:
With
and
, Eq.
A.6 can be simplified as follows:
We have proven that Eq
A.2 is equal to Eq
A.7 which is derived from Eq.
A.3. So that we have the conservation of energy at the apparent horizon in both cases:
Annex B: The Photon Energy Density Parameter
Haug, in his article [
8], develops an interesting argument around the photon energy density parameter. The current CMB photon density is about (See PDG [
9]):
The parameter
is define as
, where
is expressed in
. The Megaparsec is:
Now let’s use Eq.8 to, in a first time, calculate
based on
. For
we have an exact value for
which will use from
to
In
models so
, in S.I. units. Then we calculate:
Which can be simplified as follows:
Since
, we can derive
as follows:
If
is set, we calculate
with Eq.8 or alternatively if
is set, we calculate
with Eq.7. Then we can calculate a constant value for
as follows determinate by Eq.B.1:
Which is close to exact the value
determinate by Haug [
10] [
8]. We are limited by the precision of
value. So, it seems possible to precise the
value, as for example
, with
Annex C: Similarity Between Haug Tatum Entropy and Wojnow Entropy
In annex A, we have already demonstrated that these two entropies are equivalent. Now we examine the
value proposed by Haug [
8].
For
interdepend from
, we have exactly:
Where
is the value needed to fix
in our model (see section 5). So, Haug Tatum entropy is clearly linked to
despite the critics formulated by Haug, see [
8]. It’s only another point of view on the same subject.
References
- Albert Einstein, Stephen W. Hawking (2007). “A Stubbornly Persistent Illusion: The Essential Scientific Works of Albert Einstein”, p.353, Running Press.
- Tatum, E., Seshavatharam, U. and Lakshminarayana, S. (2015) The Basics of Flat Space Cosmology. International Journal of Astronomy and Astrophysics, 5, 116-124. https://www.scirp.org/journal/PaperInformation?PaperID=57071.
- Espen Gaarder Norwegian University of Life Sciences Haug, Stéphane Wojnow. How to predict the temperature of the CMB directly using the Hubble parameter and the Planck scale using the Stefan-Boltzman law. 2023. ⟨hal-04269991⟩.
- Haug, E.G. CMB, Hawking, Planck, and Hubble Scale Relations Consistent with Recent Quantization of General Relativity Theory. Int J Theor Phys 63, 57 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10773-024-05570-6.
- Tatum, E. and Haug, E. (2025) How the Haug-Tatum Cosmology Model Entropic Energy Might Be Directly Linked to Dark Energy. Journal of Modern Physics, 16, 382-389. doi: 10.4236/jmp.2025.163021.
- Espen Gaarder Haug, Eugene Tatum. The Hawking Hubble temperature as a minimum temperature, the Planck temperature as a maximum temperature and the CMB temperature as their geometric mean temperature. 2023. ⟨hal-04308132v2⟩.
- S. Wojnow, “Alternative Cosmology: ΛCDM-Like Predictions Today: Cosmology”, hij, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 24–30, Dec. 2023.
- E. G. Haug, Cosmic Entropy and Energy Conversation of the type ST = E, September 2025, DOI: 10.13140/RG.2.2.17336.81926.
- pdg.lbl.gov/2023/reviews/rpp2023-rev-astrophysical-constants.pdf.
- Haug, E. (2025). An Exact CMB Photon Radiation Density of the Universe Derived from Rh = ct Cosmology. Cambridge Open Engage. doi:10.33774/coe-2025-jfg4t-v2.
|
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).