Economic Growth Constraints: The Case of the Pacific Island Nations

Austin Callahan; Hudson Walls

doi:10.20944/preprints202507.1543.v1

Submitted:

17 July 2025

Posted:

18 July 2025

You are already at the latest version

Abstract

Pacific Island Nations (PINs) represent a distinctive group of states whose economic development trajectories are shaped by a complex interplay of structural vulnerabilities, environmental pressures, and institutional challenges. Despite sustained international development assistance and global attention to their unique context, these states continue to grapple with sluggish economic growth and persistent development disparities. This article investigates the multidimensional constraints to economic growth in PINs, combining a comprehensive literature review, secondary data analysis, and a qualitative assessment of policy frameworks to offer an integrated understanding of their economic fragility. Drawing on comparative insights from over 20 Pacific states, the study identifies four primary categories of impediments: geographic isolation and limited market access, environmental and climate-related vulnerabilities, weak governance and institutional capacity, and limited economic diversification. The analysis highlights how these factors are not merely additive but deeply interwoven, often reinforcing each other to entrench cycles of underdevelopment. For instance, remoteness increases trade costs, which in turn limits private sector development, while climate shocks continuously divert fiscal resources away from long-term investments. The article concludes with policy recommendations aimed at enhancing economic resilience and sustainability. These include strengthening digital and transport connectivity, integrating climate adaptation into all infrastructure planning, improving institutional quality through targeted governance reforms, and expanding human capital through education and vocational training. The findings underscore the need for a holistic, context-sensitive, and regionally coordinated approach to economic policy in PINs. Without such an approach, efforts to promote sustainable growth in these nations will remain fragmented and insufficient in the face of mounting global challenges.

Keywords:

Pacific Island Nations

;

economic growth

;

climate change

;

structural vulnerability

Subject:

Medicine and Pharmacology - Dermatology

Introduction

Pacific Island Nations (PINs) constitute one of the most economically vulnerable and environmentally exposed groups of nations in the world. Scattered across vast stretches of ocean, many of these states possess small populations, limited natural resources, and restricted economic bases—structural characteristics that profoundly shape their development trajectories. Although they account for only a fraction of global GDP, the developmental challenges confronting PINs carry global significance, particularly in the context of climate change, migration, and regional security. The economic growth of PINs has long been impeded by their geographic isolation. The considerable distance from major global markets not only inflates trade and transportation costs but also hinders integration into global value chains. Consequently, these nations struggle to achieve economies of scale or attract substantial foreign investment outside of narrow sectors such as tourism, fisheries, or natural resource extraction. This geographic constraint constitutes a foundational obstacle, exacerbating nearly every other challenge these economies face. In parallel, climate change and environmental stressors present existential threats that go beyond the economic sphere. Rising sea levels, increased frequency and intensity of cyclones, and saltwater intrusion severely disrupt infrastructure, agriculture, and water security. The diversion of limited national resources toward climate adaptation and postdisaster recovery further undermines the capacity for long-term investment and sustainable growth. Despite international climate financing mechanisms, many of the PINs lack the institutional capacity to efficiently absorb and implement adaptation funds, creating a feedback loop of vulnerability. Institutional and governance-related weaknesses also compound the problem. Political instability, limited administrative capacity, and governance challenges—such as corruption or opaque decision-making—reduce the effectiveness of development planning and policy implementation. Human capital deficits, fueled by inadequate education systems, health service gaps, and persistent brain drain, restrict the labor force's ability to support innovation or transition toward knowledge-based economic models. This article seeks to explore these interrelated constraints in greater depth. Through a mixed-methods approach grounded in rigorous literature review and comparative data analysis, the study systematically categorizes the primary growth challenges faced by PINs. It also assesses the degree to which these challenges vary across the region and evaluates policy responses to date. Ultimately, the study aims to inform a more coherent and adaptive framework for fostering inclusive, resilient, and sustainable economic growth in Pacific Island economies—one that accounts for their exceptional vulnerabilities while harnessing their untapped potential.

Literature Review

The economic development of Pacific Island Nations (PINs) presents a unique and complex case study, characterized by inherent vulnerabilities and persistent challenges that impede sustained growth. This literature review synthesizes existing academic discourse and empirical findings to establish a foundational understanding of the multifaceted obstacles confronting economic prosperity in the region. A recurring theme in the literature is the profound impact of geographic isolation and small market size (Teperek, 2024). Studies (ADB, 2015; Teperek, 2024; World Bank, 2017) consistently highlight how remoteness from major global markets inflates transaction costs, limits economies of scale, and constrains diversification opportunities. This structural impediment often results in a narrow productive base, heavily reliant on a few primary commodities, tourism, or remittances, rendering these economies susceptible to external shocks (Chand & Yala, 2018). Furthermore, the escalating threat of climate change and natural disasters is widely recognized as a significant deterrent to economic stability and growth. Research by Barnett and Adger (2007) and recent IPCC reports underscore the disproportionate vulnerability of low-lying island states to sea-level rise, extreme weather events, and ocean acidification. These phenomena not only destroy critical infrastructure and agricultural land but also divert scarce resources from productive investments towards disaster recovery and adaptation, creating a cycle of economic fragility (McNamara & Smith, 2019). Challenges related to governance, institutional capacity, and human capital development are also extensively documented. Weak institutional frameworks, issues of corruption, and political instability in some PINs can deter foreign direct investment and hinder effective policy implementation (Fry, 2011). Concurrently, limited access to quality education, healthcare, and vocational training contributes to human capital deficits, impacting productivity, innovation, and the ability to compete in a globalized economy (Connell, 2013). The literature suggests that addressing these interwoven challenges requires comprehensive, context-specific strategies that acknowledge the unique socio-economic and environmental realities of Pacific nations.

Methodology

This study adopts a comprehensive mixed-methods approach to examine the multifaceted constraints to economic growth in Pacific Island Nations (PINs). Given the complexity and interdependence of the structural, institutional, environmental, and geographic challenges these states face, the methodology integrates both qualitative and quantitative tools to ensure analytical rigor and depth. The research design is primarily descriptive and analytical, aiming to identify and categorize the principal growth barriers, and to explore the underlying causes and interactions among them. Where applicable, a comparative perspective is applied to distinguish common patterns and unique country-level vulnerabilities across the Pacific region. The investigation is grounded in a systematic review of academic literature, institutional policy documents, and secondary statistical data. A wide-ranging academic literature review constitutes the foundation of the study. Peer-reviewed articles, scholarly books, and academic dissertations published between 2000 and 2024 are examined to map the conceptual and empirical landscape. Sources are identified through academic databases such as JSTOR, Scopus, Web of Science, Google Scholar, and regional repositories like the University of the South Pacific. The keyword strategy includes terms such as "Pacific Island economies," "economic development challenges Pacific," "climate change impact Pacific," and "small island developing states economic vulnerability." Studies are selected based on relevance to economic development constraints, policy implications, and regional sustainability, with non-English publications excluded due to practical limitations. To complement the literature base, the study incorporates institutional reports and policy documents published by reputable organizations such as the World Bank, IMF, Asian Development Bank, UNDP, Pacific Community (SPC), Pacific Islands Forum Secretariat (PIFS), and national statistics offices of individual PINs. These sources provide detailed economic diagnostics, policy evaluations, and sectoral assessments that enrich the contextual understanding of regional development issues. Economic outlooks, country reports, and performance reviews are especially instrumental in evaluating external assessments and donor strategies. Quantitative data are drawn from open-access databases including the World Bank’s World Development Indicators, the IMF’s International Financial Statistics, and ADB’s Key Indicators for Asia and the Pacific. National statistical agency datasets are also consulted where available. Economic indicators such as GDP growth, per capita income, FDI inflows, trade balances, inflation, unemployment, and Human Development Index (HDI) rankings are analyzed alongside demographic data and climate-related vulnerability indices. The time span of data collection extends from 2000 to the most recent year available, allowing for longitudinal analysis of structural trends. Analytical procedures involve a combination of thematic, comparative, and trend analyses. Thematic analysis is used to extract and organize recurring concepts and challenges—such as climate vulnerability, market isolation, governance deficiencies, and infrastructure gaps—across the qualitative sources. These themes are systematically coded to uncover relationships and patterns reflected in both academic literature and institutional assessments. Comparative analysis is employed to evaluate differences in development outcomes, resilience, and policy performance across selected PINs. This crosscountry lens helps identify best practices, as well as the context-specific nature of development impediments. Trend analysis is applied to the statistical data to track macroeconomic patterns over time, using descriptive statistics and visualizations such as line charts and bar graphs to highlight changes in economic performance and structural indicators. While the study does not employ econometric modeling, careful interpretation of quantitative trends informs the broader discussion. This methodology is not without limitations. Its reliance on secondary data poses challenges related to data quality, availability, and comparability across PINs. In some cases, data are aggregated regionally, obscuring national-level variations. Furthermore, the analysis is constrained by the scope, methods, and perspectives of the original sources, with no new primary data collected. Despite these constraints, the triangulation of academic research, policy documents, and statistical evidence provides a robust and multidimensional perspective on the economic growth challenges faced by PINs.

Results

This chapter presents the synthesized findings derived from the systematic review of academic literature, institutional reports, and statistical data concerning the challenges to economic growth in Pacific Island Nations (PINs). The results are organized around the thematic areas identified in the methodology, providing a comprehensive overview of the persistent impediments to sustainable development in the region.

A.: Geographic Isolation and Market Access Constraints

The analysis consistently reveals that geographic isolation and the inherent smallness of domestic markets are fundamental structural challenges. PINs face significantly higher costs for imports and exports due to long distances and limited shipping routes, as evidenced by trade data showing elevated freight and insurance charges compared to larger economies. This phenomenon, often termed the "tyranny of distance," inflates the cost of living and doing business, thereby undermining competitiveness (ADB, 2015; World Bank, 2017). Furthermore, the small population bases limit the scope for economies of scale in production and consumption, making it difficult to attract large-scale foreign direct investment (FDI) in diversified sectors beyond traditional areas like tourism and resource extraction. Trends in FDI inflows indicate a preference for countries with larger domestic markets or strategic geographic locations for regional trade hubs, placing PINs at a disadvantage. This market fragmentation also hinders regional integration efforts, despite initiatives by bodies like the Pacific Islands Forum Secretariat, as logistical barriers remain substantial.

B.: Climate Change and Environmental Vulnerabilities

The findings unequivocally demonstrate that climate change and its associated environmental hazards pose an existential threat and a significant economic burden on PINs. Statistical data on disaster frequency and intensity, coupled with economic impact assessments, reveal a clear upward trend in losses incurred from cyclones, droughts, floods, and sea-level rise (IPCC, 2022; McNamara & Smith, 2019). These events not only cause immediate destruction of critical infrastructure (roads, ports, energy grids) and productive assets (agriculture, fisheries) but also necessitate substantial diversion of national budgets towards disaster preparedness, response, and long-term adaptation measures. This diversion often comes at the expense of investments in education, health, and other growth-enhancing sectors. The qualitative analysis of policy documents highlights that adaptation costs are often beyond the fiscal capacity of many PINs, necessitating significant external aid, which in itself can introduce dependency. Furthermore, the gradual impacts of climate change, such as ocean acidification affecting coral reefs and fisheries, and saltwater intrusion impacting freshwater sources and arable land, are eroding the natural resource base upon which many island economies depend, threatening long-term food security and livelihoods.

C.: Governance, Institutional Capacity, and Human Capital Deficits

The review of institutional reports and academic literature points to significant challenges in governance and institutional capacity across several PINs. Issues such as political instability, weak rule of law, and corruption are frequently cited as deterrents to investor confidence and effective policy implementation (Fry, 2011). These factors contribute to an unpredictable business environment, increasing perceived risks for both domestic and foreign investors. The analysis of development assistance reports often indicates that capacity building remains a critical area, particularly in public financial management, regulatory oversight, and project implementation. Concurrently, human capital development emerges as a pervasive challenge. Despite efforts, many PINs struggle with limited access to quality education, particularly at secondary and tertiary levels, and a shortage of vocational training opportunities that align with market demands (Connell, 2013). This results in a skills mismatch, high youth unemployment rates in some areas, and a reliance on expatriate labor for specialized roles. Brain drain, where skilled professionals migrate to larger economies for better opportunities, further exacerbates these deficits. The health sector also faces challenges, with non-communicable diseases (NCDs) placing a growing burden on healthcare systems and reducing workforce productivity. These human capital deficiencies directly impact the ability of PINs to innovate, diversify their economies, and effectively manage complex development programs.

D.: Economic Diversification and Sectoral Vulnerabilities

The results underscore the limited economic diversification in many PINs, leaving them highly vulnerable to external shocks. Tourism, fisheries, and remittances are dominant sectors, but each carries inherent risks. Tourism, while a significant revenue generator, is highly susceptible to global economic downturns, travel restrictions (as seen during the COVID-19 pandemic), and natural disasters. Fisheries, particularly tuna, are subject to volatile global prices, overfishing concerns, and climate change impacts on marine ecosystems. Remittances, while providing crucial household income and foreign exchange, are dependent on the economic health of host countries and can fluctuate significantly. Efforts towards agricultural diversification, sustainable resource management, and the development of niche industries (e.g., high-value aquaculture, renewable energy export) are ongoing but face considerable hurdles related to infrastructure, market access, and investment capital.

In summary, the findings confirm that the challenges to economic growth in Pacific Island Nations are deeply interconnected and mutually reinforcing. Geographic constraints amplify the impacts of climate change, while governance and human capital deficits hinder effective responses and diversification efforts. Addressing these multifaceted challenges requires integrated, long-term strategies that are tailored to the unique contexts of these vulnerable island economies.

Recommendations

Based on the comprehensive analysis of the challenges to economic growth in Pacific Island Nations (PINs) presented in the preceding chapters, this section outlines a series of strategic recommendations. These recommendations are designed to be actionable, context-sensitive, and aim to foster resilient and sustainable economic development across the region. They address the multifaceted nature of the identified impediments, emphasizing the need for integrated approaches that span various sectors and levels of governance. These are following:

Enhancing regional connectivity and market integration

To mitigate the adverse effects of geographic isolation and small market size, a concerted effort towards enhancing regional connectivity and fostering deeper market integration is paramount.

⇒: Investment in digital infrastructure: Prioritize investment in robust and affordable digital infrastructure, including undersea fiber optic cables and satellite connectivity. Improved internet access can significantly reduce transaction costs, facilitate e-commerce, enable remote services, and connect local businesses to global markets, thereby overcoming physical distance barriers.
⇒: Strengthening air and sea links: Develop and upgrade critical air and sea transport infrastructure, including ports and airports, alongside fostering regional shipping and airline partnerships. Subsidies or preferential agreements for interisland trade and international freight could also be explored to reduce logistical costs and improve the reliability of supply chains.
⇒: Regional trade facilitation: Accelerate efforts towards harmonizing trade policies, customs procedures, and regulatory frameworks across PINs. This would streamline intra-regional trade, create larger effective markets, and enhance the collective bargaining power of PINs in international trade negotiations. Initiatives like the Pacific Agreement on Closer Economic Relations (PACER Plus) should be fully implemented and continuously reviewed for effectiveness.

Building Climate Resilience and Sustainable Resource Management

Given the acute vulnerability of PINs to climate change, integrating climate resilience into all economic planning and development initiatives is non-negotiable.

⇒: Climate-resilient infrastructure: Invest in the construction and upgrading of climate-resilient infrastructure (e.g., elevated roads, cyclone-proof buildings, resilient water systems). This requires significant financial commitment, often necessitating international climate finance mechanisms and partnerships with multilateral development banks.
⇒: Ecosystem-based adaptation: Promote and invest in ecosystem-based adaptation strategies, such as mangrove restoration, coral reef protection, and sustainable forestry. These natural defenses provide cost-effective protection against climate impacts while simultaneously supporting biodiversity and local livelihoods.
⇒: Diversification of energy sources: Transition away from fossil fuel dependency towards renewable energy sources (solar, wind, hydro, geothermal). This not only reduces carbon footprints but also enhances energy security, reduces exposure to volatile global oil prices, and frees up foreign exchange for other development priorities.
⇒: Sustainable fisheries and agriculture: Implement and enforce robust policies for sustainable fisheries management to combat overfishing and illegal, unreported, and unregulated (IUU) fishing. Similarly, promote climate-smart agriculture practices, including drought-resistant crops and diversified farming systems, to enhance food security and agricultural productivity in the face of changing climatic conditions.

Strengthening Governance and Institutional Capacity

Effective governance and robust institutions are foundational for sustainable economic growth and the efficient utilization of development assistance.

⇒: Enhancing public financial management: Implement reforms to strengthen public financial management systems, including budgeting, expenditure control, and revenue collection. This improves fiscal discipline, reduces waste, and enhances accountability in the use of public funds.
⇒: Promoting transparency and anti-corruption measures: Establish and enforce strong anti-corruption frameworks, including independent oversight bodies, asset declaration requirements, and whistleblower protection. Increased transparency in government operations and procurement processes can significantly improve investor confidence and the equitable distribution of economic benefits.
⇒: Capacity building for policy implementation: Invest in targeted capacity-building programs for civil servants and policymakers in areas such as economic planning, project management, regulatory enforcement, and data analysis. This ensures that policies are not only well-formulated but also effectively implemented and monitored.
⇒: Strengthening rule of law: Uphold and strengthen the rule of law, ensuring predictable legal frameworks, efficient judicial systems, and secure property rights. A stable and just legal environment is crucial for attracting and retaining investment.

Investing in Human Capital Development

Addressing human capital deficits is critical for fostering innovation, productivity, and economic diversification.

⇒: Quality education and vocational training: Prioritize investment in improving the quality and accessibility of education at all levels, from early childhood to tertiary. Develop vocational training programs that are demand-driven and align with emerging economic opportunities (e.g., in renewable energy, digital services, sustainable tourism).
⇒: Addressing brain drain: Implement strategies to retain skilled professionals, including competitive remuneration packages, professional development opportunities, and incentives for returning diaspora members. Fostering a dynamic and supportive local work environment can help mitigate the impacts of brain drain.
⇒: Healthcare system strengthening: Invest in strengthening healthcare systems to address prevalent health challenges, particularly non-communicable diseases. A healthy workforce is a productive workforce, and robust public health infrastructure is essential for economic resilience.
⇒: Digital literacy and skills: Promote digital literacy across the population and develop specialized digital skills training programs. This is crucial for participating in the global digital economy and for leveraging technology to enhance productivity in traditional sectors.

Fostering Economic Diversification and Value Addition

Moving beyond reliance on a few primary sectors is essential for long-term economic stability.

⇒: Promoting niche tourism: Develop high-value, sustainable tourism segments that leverage the unique cultural and natural assets of PINs, such as eco-tourism, cultural tourism, and adventure tourism. This can reduce environmental impact while maximizing economic returns.
⇒: Developing blue economy initiatives: Explore and invest in sustainable "blue economy" initiatives beyond traditional fisheries, such as aquaculture, marine biotechnology, and ocean-based renewable energy. This requires careful environmental impact assessments and robust regulatory frameworks.
⇒: Supporting small and medium enterprises (SMEs): Provide targeted support for SMEs through access to finance, business development services, and simplified regulatory processes. SMEs are crucial for job creation, local value addition, and fostering entrepreneurial ecosystems.
⇒: Leveraging remittances for productive investment: Develop financial instruments and incentives to channel remittances from consumption towards productive investments, such as small businesses, education, and housing, thereby maximizing their developmental impact.

These recommendations, while broad, underscore the need for a holistic and collaborative approach involving national governments, regional organizations, international partners, and local communities. Their successful implementation will be critical for transforming the economic landscape of Pacific Island Nations from one of vulnerability to one of sustainable growth and resilience.

Conclusions

This study has undertaken a comprehensive examination of the multifaceted challenges that impede sustained economic growth in Pacific Island Nations (PINs). Drawing on a systematic review of academic literature, institutional reports, and statistical data, the research has illuminated the deeply interconnected nature of these impediments. The findings affirm that addressing the economic vulnerabilities of PINs requires integrated, context-sensitive strategies that go beyond sectoral or short-term interventions. One of the most critical structural barriers identified is the geographic isolation and small scale of domestic markets. This so-called "tyranny of distance" results in elevated transaction and logistics costs, limited economies of scale, and constrained potential for economic diversification. Consequently, many PINs remain dependent on narrow productive sectors that are highly vulnerable to external shocks. Climate change and environmental degradation further compound these structural constraints. The increasing frequency and severity of natural disasters—cyclones, sea-level rise, and saltwater intrusion—impose both immediate and long-term economic costs. These shocks not only destroy physical infrastructure and disrupt agricultural production but also redirect scarce public resources away from strategic development investments toward emergency response and climate adaptation, thereby reinforcing a cycle of economic fragility. In addition, the study has highlighted significant challenges related to governance, institutional capacity, and human capital development. Weak institutional frameworks, political instability, and governance deficits—such as limited transparency and perceived corruption—reduce policy credibility, discourage foreign investment, and weaken implementation capacity. At the same time, chronic underinvestment in human capital limits productivity and innovation. Limited access to quality education, vocational training, and healthcare services, combined with the persistent outmigration of skilled labor (brain drain), constrains the ability of these economies to develop a competitive, knowledge-based workforce. Moreover, the continued reliance on a narrow set of sectors—including tourism, fisheries, and remittances—exposes PINs to global market volatility, pandemics, and geopolitical shifts, leaving them economically vulnerable and fiscally constrained. In response to these complex and interrelated challenges, this study proposes a set of strategic policy recommendations. These include prioritizing investments in resilient digital and physical infrastructure to improve regional connectivity and access to global markets; mainstreaming climate adaptation into national development strategies through climate-smart planning and ecosystem-based approaches; and strengthening governance systems to enhance transparency, accountability, and institutional efficiency. Particular emphasis is placed on human capital development, with a focus on reducing skills gaps, improving health outcomes, and reversing brain drain through targeted incentives. Crucially, the study underscores the need for robust economic diversification—supporting niche tourism markets, blue economy initiatives, and the development of small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) to build more inclusive and shock-resilient economies. Ultimately, the future trajectory of economic growth in Pacific Island Nations depends on a holistic, inclusive, and coordinated response. National governments must continue advancing sound macroeconomic policies, institutional reforms, and climate-resilient planning. Regional organizations should facilitate collective action, regional policy harmonization, and advocacy on behalf of the unique needs of PINs. International development partners and multilateral institutions have a vital role to play in providing technical assistance and financial support, particularly for infrastructure, climate adaptation, and institutional strengthening. Equally, the active engagement of local communities is essential to ensure that development efforts are locally grounded, socially inclusive, and environmentally sustainable. While the constraints facing Pacific Island Nations are significant, they are not insurmountable. With strategic leadership, long-term investment, and multilevel cooperation, PINs can overcome these barriers and lay the foundation for resilient, diversified, and sustainable economic development in the decades to come.

References

ADB. Pacific Economic Monitor: July 2015; Asian Development Bank, 2015. [Google Scholar]
Barnett, J.; Adger, W. N. Climate change, human security and violent conflict. Political Geography 2007, 26(6), 639–655. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Bishop, M.; Bouhia, R.; Carter, G.; Corbett, J.; Lindsay, C.; Scobie, M. Towards sustained development in small island developing states (ODI Working Paper No. 46). Overseas Development Institute. 2021. Available online: https://odi.org/en/publications/towardssustained-development-in-small-island-developing-states/.
Briguglio, L. Small island developing states and their economic vulnerabilities. World Development 1995, 23(9), 1615–1632. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Briguglio, L. Small island developing states and their economic vulnerabilities. In Scope-Scientific Committee on Problems of the Environment International Council of Scientific Unions 1997, 58, 210–215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Chand, S.; Yala, C. Governance and Development in the Pacific. In The Contemporary Pacific (various issues). 2018.
Connell, J. Islands at risk? Environments, economies and contemporary change; dward Elgar Publishing, 2013. [Google Scholar]
Encontre, P. The vulnerability and resilience of small island developing states in the context of globalization. Natural Resources Forum 1999, 23(3), 261–270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Fry, G. Political legitimacy and the post-colonial state in the Pacific: Reflections on some common threads in the Fiji and Solomon Islands coups. The Journal of Pacific History 2011, 46(3), 293–312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Guillaumont, P. Assessing the economic vulnerability of small island developing states and the least developed countries (WIDER Research Paper No. 2007/40); UNUWIDER, 2007. [Google Scholar]
IPCC. Climate Change 2022: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability.; Contribution of Working Group II to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, 2022. [Google Scholar]
McNamara, K. E.; Smith, R. Climate change adaptation strategies of small island developing states: A systematic review and critical analysis. Regional Environmental Change 2019, 18(2), 311–320. [Google Scholar]
Teperek, A.A. Long-Term Economic Growth in the World's Smallest Economies: Historical, Political, and Economical Aspects; Springer Nature, Cham, Switzerland, 2024. [Google Scholar]
World Bank. Pacific Possible: Long-term Economic Opportunities and Challenges for Pacific Island Countries.; World Bank Group, 2017. [Google Scholar]

Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

Copyright: This open access article is published under a Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 license, which permit the free download, distribution, and reuse, provided that the author and preprint are cited in any reuse.