Submitted:
21 April 2025
Posted:
23 April 2025
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
Keywords:
1. Introduction
1.1. Background of the Study
1.2. Definition of Key Terms
- ICT: Refers to the technologies that provide access to information through telecommunications. It includes the internet, wireless networks, computers, and mobile devices.
- E-Government: The use of ICTs to deliver government services and information to the public, businesses, and other arms of government.
1.3. Importance of ICT in Governance
1.4. Statement of the Problem
1.5. Objectives of the Study
- To examine how ICT tools are used in delivering e-government services
- To evaluate the impact of ICT on service efficiency, transparency, and accessibility
- To identify challenges hindering the effective implementation of ICT in governance
- To propose strategies for enhancing ICT integration in e-government initiatives
1.6. Research Questions
- How is ICT currently being applied in e-government services?
- What benefits has ICT brought to public service delivery?
- What are the major barriers to ICT integration in government?
- How can governments optimize the use of ICT to enhance service delivery?
1.7. Scope and Limitations
1.8. Structure of the Paper
2. Literature Review
2.1. Theoretical Framework
- Technology Acceptance Model (TAM): Proposes that perceived ease of use and perceived usefulness determine the acceptance of technology by users.
- Diffusion of Innovation Theory (DOI): Explains how new technologies are adopted across populations over time, based on innovation, communication channels, time, and social systems.
2.2. ICT and E-Government: Conceptual Linkage
- Online portals for services like tax filing, license registration, and welfare application
- Mobile applications for real-time notifications and public engagement
- Big data and cloud services for storing and analyzing citizen information
- AI and chatbots for responsive public sesrvice
2.3. Review of Related Studies
| Author(s) | Country/Context | Findings | Limitations |
| Heeks (2006) | Developing countries | ICT can improve efficiency but often fails due to design–reality gaps. | Lack of contextual understanding |
| Ndou (2004) | Africa | E-government improves transparency and accountability in public service. | Infrastructure limitations |
| United Nations (2022) | Global | Top-performing countries integrate mobile and AI solutions for governance. | Variability across regions |
| Misuraca & Viscusi (2015) | EU | ICT fosters citizen participation through open government platforms. | Privacy and data protection challenges |
| Almarabeh & AbuAli (2010) | Jordan | ICT increases access to services, especially in rural areas. | Digital literacy remains a barrier |
2.4. Gaps in Existing Research
- Evaluating long-term sustainability of e-government platforms
- Understanding the socio-political resistance to ICT adoption
- Measuring user satisfaction and feedback integration in ICT systems
- Tailoring ICT solutions to underdeveloped digital environments
3. Methodology
3.1. Research Design
3.2. Population and Sampling
- Government ICT departments
- Public service users (citizens)
- E-government developers and stakeholders
3.3. Data Collection Methods
- Surveys: Structured questionnaires were administered to 150 participants including civil servants, ICT professionals, and the public.
- Interviews: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 10 government ICT officers and 5 e-government project managers.
- Analysis of reports from the United Nations E-Government Development Index (EGDI)
- Academic publications and whitepapers on ICT and public service delivery
- National ICT policy documents and e-government frameworks
3.4. Data Analysis Techniques
- Quantitative data were analyzed using descriptive statistics (percentages, mean scores) and inferential analysis (correlation and regression) to determine relationships between ICT usage and perceived service quality.
- Qualitative data from interviews were transcribed and analyzed using thematic coding to identify key themes, patterns, and challenges.
3.5. Ethical Considerations
- Informed Consent: Participants were briefed on the study’s purpose and consent was obtained before data collection.
- Confidentiality: Responses were anonymized to protect the identity of participants.
- Data Security: All electronic data were stored securely with restricted access.
4. Results and Findings
4.1. ICT Tools Commonly Used in E-Government Platforms
| ICT Tool | Respondents Using Tool (%) |
| Online Service Portals | 82% |
| Mobile Applications | 65% |
| SMS Notification Systems | 49% |
| Social Media Platforms | 37% |
| AI Chatbots | 21% |
| Email Services | 43% |
4.2. User Perception of E-Government Services
4.3. Impact of ICT on Public Service Delivery
- Reduced waiting times at service centers due to online options
- Increased citizen engagement through digital feedback mechanisms
- Transparency in administrative processes, especially in procurement and budget tracking
- 24/7 service availability via portals and mobile platforms
4.4. Identified Challenges in ICT Implementation
- Inadequate infrastructure, especially in rural areas
- Low digital literacy among older populations
- Cybersecurity risks and poor data protection policies
- Resistance to change among government employees
| Challenge | Frequency (from interviews) |
| Poor Internet Connectivity | 8 out of 10 respondents |
| Lack of Skilled Personnel | 7 out of 10 respondents |
| Funding Constraints | 6 out of 10 respondents |
| Bureaucratic Resistance | 5 out of 10 respondents |
| Data Privacy Concerns | 4 out of 10 respondents |
4.5. Summary of Key Findings
- ICT tools significantly improve accessibility and efficiency of public services.
- Mobile and online platforms are the most widely used channels.
- Challenges persist, especially in terms of infrastructure, literacy, and security.
5. Discussion
5.1. Interpretation of Key Findings
5.2. ICT and Improved Governance
| Governance Indicator | ICT Benefit | Example |
| Transparency | Open data platforms | Public budget portals |
| Efficiency | Automated systems | Digital tax collection |
| Accessibility | 24/7 service platforms | Online driver’s license renewal |
| Accountability | Digital feedback and reporting tools | Citizen complaint portals |
| Inclusion | Rural mobile service centers | E-voting & rural SMS alerts |
5.3. Integration with Theoretical Frameworks
5.4. Challenges Limiting ICT Adoption
5.5. Implications for Policy and Practice
- Invest in ICT infrastructure, especially in underserved areas
- Enact and enforce data privacy and cybersecurity regulations
- Promote digital literacy through training programs
- Encourage public-private partnerships for technological development
- Establish change management policies within government agencies
6. Conclusion and Recommendations
6.1. Conclusion
6.2. Recommendations
| Area | Recommendation |
| Infrastructure | Expand broadband access and invest in reliable ICT infrastructure |
| Human Capacity | Train public servants and citizens on digital literacy and ICT skills |
| Policy & Regulation | Enforce strong data privacy and cybersecurity policies |
| Innovation | Encourage local ICT innovations through public-private partnerships |
| Monitoring & Evaluation | Establish performance metrics for ICT effectiveness in service delivery |
6.3. Future Research Directions
- Longitudinal evaluations of e-government platforms over time
- Cross-country comparisons on ICT policy outcomes
- The role of emerging technologies (e.g., AI, blockchain) in public service
- User satisfaction and digital inclusion metrics, especially among vulnerable groups
References
- Heeks, R. (2006). Implementing and Managing E-Government: An International Text. SAGE Publications. [CrossRef]
- Ndou, V. (2004). “E-Government for Developing Countries: Opportunities and Challenges.” The Electronic Journal on Information Systems in Developing Countries, 18(1), 1–24. [CrossRef]
- United Nations. (2022). UN E-Government Survey 2022: The Future of Digital Government. Department of Economic and Social Affairs (UNDESA). https://publicadministration.un.org/egovkb/en-us/Reports/UN-E-Government-Survey-2022.
- Davis, F. D. (1989). “Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology.” MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340.
- Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of Innovations (5th ed.). Free Press.
- OECD. (2019). Digital Government Review: Brazil – Towards the Digital Transformation of the Public Sector. OECD Digital Government Studies. [CrossRef]
- World Bank. (2020). Digital Government Readiness Assessment Toolkit. https://www.worldbank.org/en/topic/digitaldevelopment/publication/digital-government.
- Bwalya, K. J., & Mutula, S. M. (2016). E-Government: Implementation, Adoption and Synthesis in Developing Countries. Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co KG.
- Layne, K., & Lee, J. (2001). “Developing Fully Functional E-Government: A Four Stage Model.” Government Information Quarterly, 18(2), 122–136. [CrossRef]
- Carter, L., & Bélanger, F. (2005). “The Utilization of E-Government Services: Citizen Trust, Innovation and Acceptance Factors.” Information Systems Journal, 15(1), 5–25.
- Al Wahid, Sk Ayub, Nur Mohammad, Rakibul Islam, Md Habibullah Faisal, and Md Sohel Rana. "Evaluation of Information Technology Implementation for Business Goal Improvement under Process Functionality in Economic Development." Journal of Data Analysis and Information Processing 12, no. 2 (2024): 304-317. [CrossRef]
- Ahmed, Khandakar Rabbi, Rakibul Islam, Md Ariful Alam, Mir Araf Hossain Rivin, Mahfuz Alam, and Md Shafiqur Rahman. "A Management Information Systems Framework for Sustainable Cloud-Based Smart E-Healthcare Research Information Systems in Bangladesh." In 2024 Asian Conference on Intelligent Technologies (ACOIT), pp. 1-5. IEEE, 2024.



Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
