Preprint
Article

This version is not peer-reviewed.

3D Printing of New Foods Using Cellulose‐Based Gels Obtained from Cerotonia siliqua L. Byproducts

A peer-reviewed article of this preprint also exists.

Submitted:

01 November 2024

Posted:

01 November 2024

You are already at the latest version

Abstract

Carob pulp is a valuable source of cellulose-rich fraction (CRF) for many food applications. This study aimed to obtain and characterize a CRF derived from carob pulp waste, after sugar removal, and to evaluate its potential use in the 3D printing of cellulose-rich foods. Thus, extraction of the CRF present in carob pulp (by obtaining the alcohol-insoluble residue) was carried out, accounting for nearly 45 % dm (dry matter) of this by-product. The CRF contained about 24 % dm of cellulose. The functional properties (swelling capacity, water retention and fat adsorption) related to this fraction were determined, which showed a value of 5.9 mL/g of CRF, 4.0 and 6.5 g/g of CRF, respectively. Different gels were formulated with a total solids content of 15 % wm (wet matter), using potato peel flour as a base and partially substituting with CRF (0-8 % wm). The cellulose-based gels were characterized in terms of viscosity, water distribution (low-field NMR), and printability, while the 3D-printed samples were assessed for their textural properties. As the percentage of added CRF increased, the viscosity decreased while the water retention increased. Printability improved when small proportions of CRF (2-4%) were used, while deteriorated for higher percentages (6-8 %). The textural properties (hardness, adhesiveness, cohesiveness, and gumminess) showed significant changes caused by the addition of CRF, with gels containing 3-4 % CRF exhibiting the most suitable printing values. In summary, CRF extracted from carob pulp waste can be used as an ingredient in the 3D printing of novel cellulose-rich foods, reducing food waste within the framework of the circular economy.

Keywords: 
;  ;  ;  

1. Introduction

Currently, food waste is a serious global problem, as it significantly contributes to greenhouse gas emissions. In fact, it is estimated that globally, food waste is responsible for approximately 6% of total greenhouse gas production. In addition to the pollution generated by this waste, there is a valuable loss of nutrients from unused food [1].
Among the different residues, lignocellulosic residues stand out because of their high polysaccharide content. Lignocellulosic biomass comes from different natural organic plant-based materials. The structure of the cell wall in this biomass consists mainly of three types of biopolymers: cellulose, hemicellulose, and lignin [2].
Cellulose is formed by a linear chain of 500 to 7500 D-glucose monomers linked by β-(1→4) bonds. On the other hand, hemicelluloses are composed of glucose, mannose, and/or xylose backbones linked by β-(1→4) bonds, and they interlace with cellulose, proteins, and lignin through covalent bonds. Lignin is an amorphous, cross-linked copolymer synthesized randomly from three different diphenylpropane monomers: p-coumaryl alcohol, coniferyl alcohol, and sinapyl alcohol. These monomers are synthesized via the phenylpropanoid pathway in plants and differ in their degree of methoxylation [3].
Carob pulp is an example of a lignocellulosic agri-food residue. The carob tree (Ceratonia siliqua L.) is a perennial tree that belongs to the Leguminosae or Fabaceae family (subfamily Caesalpinioideae) and has its origins in the Mediterranean region. Since ancient times, it has been widely used due to its edible fruits, known as carobs [4].
Carob seeds are recognized as the most valuable part of this fruit and are used by the industry to produce locust bean gum. It is a natural food additive (LBG, E410) widely used as a thickening and stabilizing agent. On the other hand, carob pulp, which is obtained after extracting the seeds, has been undervalued and considered an agricultural waste or with little commercial value.
Despite not being fully utilized and valued, several studies have demonstrated the remarkable health benefits that carob can provide. This fruit is notable for its content of soluble sugars, low fat levels, high polysaccharides content, and the presence of various bioactive molecules such as polyphenols [5]. Sugars, mainly sucrose, are usually extracted to produce carob syrup. After sugar extraction, this material is an important source of insoluble fiber mainly composed of lignin, cellulose and hemicellulose [6], comprising ca. 30-40% of the carob pulp [7].
Studies on carob pulp have demonstrated its potential as a source of dietary fiber and polysaccharides, such as cellulose, for improving the rheological properties of foods. For example, carob flour has been successfully integrated into bread formulations to enhance dough characteristics, improve texture, and promote moisture retention. Its use in food products contributes to the overall sensory and functional properties, making carob pulp a valuable natural ingredient for enriching foods with fiber while optimizing their texture and stability [8]. Similarly, Restuccia et al. [9] observed that adding carob pulp to gluten-free bakery products formulations led to lower cohesive interaction and rigidity.
Cellulose rich solids can be used in the productions of gels-type materials which have several interesting applications [10]. For instance, gels produced from different types of cellulose have been used in the formulation of ink for 3D printing [11].
While 3D printing technology was initially mainly used in non-food sectors, it is now being applied in the production of a wide range of foods. 3D printing in the food sector offers the opportunity to create personalized products, improve their nutritional content, enhance health benefits, and extend their shelf life [12]. Extrusion-based printing is the most widely for 3D printing of foods. This type of printing is primarily achieved by the displacement of a piston that pushes a molten or semi-solid sample contained in a syringe through a cannula. Essentially, the printing process resembles the flow of a sample fluid inside the syringe cylinder. Previous studies on 3D food printing have highlighted the importance of the rheological properties of the printed material, as these properties reflect the fluid flow characteristics and are considered key research elements [13].
During the printing process, food is constructed by depositing successive layers following a previously designed model. Furthermore, the careful selection of raw materials can contribute to improving both the quality and nutritional value of the produced food [14].
Different materials have been used for food printing including protein, carbohydrates or fat [12,15]. High molecular weight carbohydrates like starch are interesting since it undergoes gelatinization (where water and heat break intermolecular bonds, allowing starch to bind more water) [15], producing a gel that is a suitable base for 3D inks formulations [16]. Moreover, starch could be obtained from abundant and inexpensive sources like potatoes. However, to make the formulation more nutritionally beneficial, it would be advantageous to enrich it with nutrient-dense sources [12]. Currently, there is a growing interest in using more sustainable materials for 3D food printing, with particular focus on using food waste. For example, incorporating grape pomace and broken wheat into cookie dough formulations has been explored as a 3D printing ink. These ingredients not only enhance the dough’s nutritional profile with added fiber and antioxidants but also contribute to the sustainable use of food by-products [17]. Similarly, mushroom by-products [18] have been used in the formulation of edible inks and they have even improved the stability of the shape in pastes made of potato flour, thanks to the presence of proteins and fiber. Muthurajan et al [19] used potato peel as an ingredient combined with wheat flour in the formulation of noodle prepared by 3D printing and observed that by incorporating potato peel powder, the noodles gain additional fiber, vitamins, and minerals.
In this context, carob pulp has been used in 3D printing of chocolate as a sweetener [20], the authors reported that samples containing 30% of carob pulp extract were scored with the most pleasant outcomes in sensory tests. It has also been used as a flour for 3D printed cookies [21]. The study found that carob pulp flour enhances 3D-printed cookie formulations by adding nutritional value, specifically fiber, and positively impacting dough texture and stability. Carob flour also improved the final printed structure of cookies, allowing for precise shapes and better consistency. Research on carob pulp as an ingredient for 3D food printing formulations is limited, creating a promising area for study. The aim of this work is to evaluate the effect of the addition of a cellulose rich-fraction coming from carob pulp in the formulation of edible ink based on potato peel flour. The inks were characterized in terms of viscosity, water distribution and printability. After printing, the pastes were evaluated in terms of textural parameters and porosity.

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. Characterization of Carob Cellulose-Rich Fraction (CRF)

A yield of 44.5 ± 3.0 g CRF per 100 g of carob pulp was obtained, indicating that approximately 45% of the carob pulp can be considered dietary fiber. This value is closely aligned with the findings reported by Nasar-Abbas [22], who estimated the fiber content of carob pulp to be around 40%.

2.1.1. Analysis of Carbohydrate Composition

Monosaccharides composition of carob cellulose-rich fraction (CRF) is shown in Table 1. As shown, more than 65% of the CRF corresponds to the sugars present.
The total monosaccharides represent approximately 25% of the carob pulp. Table 1 also highlights a high glucose content, indicating significant amounts of cellulose (24.4%). Additionally, a high concentration of pectic polysaccharides, or pectins, is notable. This is evidenced by the detection of a considerable amount of uronic acids, particularly galacturonic acid. Furthermore, although in smaller amounts compared to uronic acids, significant levels of rhamnose, arabinose, and galactose were found monosaccharides that are components of the pectin structure [23]. Other sugars detected, such as xylose, mannose, and fucose, suggest the presence of small amounts of hemicelluloses, likely xyloglucans and xylans [24]. In addition to the polysaccharides that form the cell walls of carob pulp, significant amounts of lignin were also estimated. Specifically, for every gram of CRF, up to 340 mg of lignin were found.

2.1.2. Functional Properties

The chemical structure of the polysaccharides that make up the plant cell wall is closely related to the functional properties of the cellulose-rich fraction (CRF). Table 2 presents the values of the functional properties determined for CRF (swelling capacity (Sw), fat adsorption capacity (FAC), and water retention capacity (WRC)).
The swelling capacity of the sample was of the same order as that reported by Petkova et al. [25] (11.4 mL/g) for the galactomannan extract from carob flour, but it was considerably lower than the value reported by Fidan et al. [26] (30 mL/g) for the polysaccharide extract obtained from carob seeds. These differences may be attributed to the fact that swelling capacity can be influenced by climate and agricultural conditions. Additionally, it is known that extracts from different parts of the carob plant may exhibit different functional properties [25].
The fat adsorption capacity of carob CRF was lower than that obtained by Petkova et al. [25] for the galactomannan extract from carob flour. The FAC results were higher than the water retention capacity (WRC), suggesting that CRF could be suitable for use in the formulation of food emulsions.
The water retention capacity of carob CRF was higher than that of the galactomannan extract from carob flour, which was 0.14 g/g [25]. However, the value was very similar to that obtained for a polysaccharide extract from carob seeds (8.3 ± 0.02 g/g) [26] and to that of carob gum (5.6 g/g) [27]. This indicates that during the polysaccharide extraction process, a structural change occurs, making hydrophilic groups more accessible. The composition and structure of proteins and their interactions with other substances control the functional properties of carob CRF. WRC is essential for the sensory evaluation of formulated food products, as it represents the ability to absorb and retain hydrodynamic, capillary, and physically trapped water against gravity. WRC affects texture, juiciness, taste, and especially the shelf life of products.

2.2. Characterization of Cellulose-Based Gels

To evaluate the suitability of the different cellulose-based gels prepared as raw materials for the development of new 3D-printed foods, various properties such as apparent viscosity, water distribution, and printability were assessed.

2.2.1. Apparent Viscosity

Apparent viscosity is a critical property influencing extrusion-based 3D printing. Its value must fall within a range low enough to allow the material to pass through the printer nozzle, yet high enough to ensure proper adhesion between printed layers [28].
Figure 1 displays the apparent viscosity values of the different cellulose-based gels prepared, including the control (0% CRF) and the gels containing different proportions of CRF (2-8%). The addition of higher percentages of CRF caused a significant decrease in viscosity, with statistically significant differences observed between the gels containing carob fiber (p < 0.05). This can be attributed to the substitution of potato peel, the gelling agent due to its starch content, with carob fiber, as the total solids content (15%) remained constant across all experiments. No significant differences (p > 0.05) were observed at lower concentrations of added carob fiber, as seen between the control gel and the gel with 2% CRF. However, in the rest of the inks, significant differences (p < 0.05) were observed, even when the fiber increment between samples did not exceed 1-2%. This same effect was reported by Reche et al. [29] when potato flour was replaced by mushroom byproduct flour.

2.2.2. Water Distribution

Water distribution is closely related to the properties and structure of the material and can be analyzed in cellulose-based gels for 3D printing using nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) [30]. Figure 2 shows the relaxation time corresponding to each of the analyzed samples.
The transverse relaxation time (T₂), determined through LF-NMR analysis, indicates the degree of water mobility within the cellulose-based gels. A lower T₂ value signifies that water is more tightly bound to the solid components, while a higher T₂ value suggests greater water mobility, as it is less bound [31].
Regarding the two peaks, T21 and T22, these correspond to water bound to different macromolecules. Moreover, the existence of two peaks indicates the presence of one fraction of water that is more strongly bound (bound water) and a second fraction with lower affinity (immobilized water). When analyzing the gels containing CRF in comparison to the control gel, it was observed that the control curve was shifted further to the left, indicating stronger cohesion of water molecules with the macromolecules formed by the various types of polysaccharides. In contrast, when evaluating only the CRF-containing gels, the area under the curve increased as the proportion of added CRF rose, up to a certain point where a significant decrease was noted, particularly in the S8% sample. This trend suggests that increasing CRF content enhances water retention in the gel. However, in the case of S8%, where the proportion of CRF exceeds that of the added potato peel, a distinct behavior was observed.
The T23 peak corresponds to longer relaxation times, representing free water within the gel matrix. It was observed that as the proportion of CRF increased, the peak shifted slightly to the left along the x-axis (indicating shorter times), suggesting that the mobility of the water is altered depending on the amount of added CRF. In the case of the S8% sample, a more pronounced shift towards shorter relaxation times was noted, which suggests a significant reduction in water mobility. Furthermore, the addition of CRF led to a decrease in both the intensity and area of the peaks, indicating a reduction in the amount of free water within the sample. These changes in the relaxation time of the T23 peak can be explained by the high-water retention capacity of CRF within the gel, thereby reducing the free water content and increasing the stability of the resulting gel. This same effect was observed by Reche et al. [29] when replacing potato purée with mushroom flour.

2.2.3. Printability

The cellulose-based gel intended for 3D printing must possess an optimal composition that provides the best extrusion and shape retention capabilities [32]. As previously mentioned, the printability of each formulation was evaluated by printing the gels in a floral shape to assess geometric accuracy and stability. Table 3 presents representative images of the cellulose-based gels that were 3D printed, along with the printability rating for each formulation on a scale from 1 (very poor) to 5 (very good) [33].
The control samples did not receive the highest score due to the high viscosity of the gel, which hindered the extrusion, causing it to be unevenly distributed throughout the structure, resulting in a significant number of holes. Reche et al. [29] attributed this effect to the excessive starch content in potato peel, which impeded the pass of the gel through the nozzle and, consequently, led to structural imperfections characterized by the presence of holes. Regarding the S2% and S3% samples, the layers were clearly distinguishable, and the gear shape was printed with excellent definition. However, starting from S4% the clarity of the shape and layer separation diminished. At higher proportions, particularly in the S8% sample, where the proportion of carob fiber exceeded that of potato peel, the separation between the applied layers was no longer clearly distinguishable.

2.3. Characterization of 3D Printed Samples

2.3.1. Textural Properties

Textural properties such as hardness, cohesiveness, adhesiveness and gumminess are important characteristics of 3D-printed foods [34]. Figure 3 shows the results of the textural properties, including hardness (a), adhesiveness (b), cohesiveness (c), and gumminess (d).
The hardness is related to the first bite sensation in the mouth and is indicated by the maximum force of the first compression cycle [35]. As shown in Figure 3a, the samples with 2% and 3% added CRF did not exhibit significant differences compared to the control sample (p>0.05). On the other hand, the samples with a higher percentage of incorporated carob fiber (4%, 6%, and 8%) showed a significant decrease in hardness (p<0.05), with the most pronounced reduction observed in the sample containing 4% added CRF. This could be related to the apparent viscosity and water distribution observations mentioned earlier. When a portion of the potato flour was replaced with carob fiber, the starch content decreased, leading to a significant reduction in the apparent viscosity of the ink and the water-binding strength. Consequently, this contributed to a decrease in hardness after printing, as starch is the key gelling component [29].
Adhesiveness can be defined as the negative area of force at the end of the first compression, when the probe is retracted. It can be interpreted as a sticky sensation in the mouth [36]. As shown in Figure 3b, this property exhibits a significant increase when comparing the control gel or S2% with the S8% sample, the latter having the highest proportion of added CRF.
Cohesiveness refers to the strength of the internal bonds that make up the structure of a food, as well as how much a food can be deformed before it breaks. It is calculated as the ratio of the positive force area of the second compression to that of the first compression [37]. Regarding this property, the results are similar to those obtained for adhesiveness. As shown in Figure 3c, a slight decrease is observed at low proportions of added CRF, followed by a significant increase compared to the control gel (p<0.05) when the CRF percentages rise to 8%.
Gumminess represents the energy required for food to reach a swallowable state and is defined as the product of hardness and cohesiveness [38]. This is a highly relevant textural characteristic, especially in semi-solid foods with low hardness and high cohesiveness [35]. The results presented in Figure 3d were quite similar to those for hardness. Maximum gumminess was observed in the control gel, although significant increases in gumminess values were noted at high percentages of CRF.

2.3.2. Microstructure

Table 4 presents the images obtained via scanning electron microscopy (SEM) related to the printed samples: on one hand, the control sample, and on the other, the prints made with gels incorporating CRF at concentrations of 2, 3, 4, 6, and 8%. The control sample exhibits an open structure with parts organized in a honeycomb pattern. The addition of CRF to the gel resulted in a closure of the structure; however, as the proportion of CRF increased, smaller cavities began to emerge. To corroborate the information obtained from the SEM images, the porosity of the different samples was measured. Figure 4 shows the percentages of porosity for the printed samples across the different formulations.
As shown in Figure 4, there is an upward trend in porosity values as the proportion of CRF increases, except in the case of the S8% sample, which exhibits a significant decrease (p<0.05). Overall, an increase in porosity was observed among the control gel, S2%, S3%, S4%, and S6% samples, with particularly significant changes noted for the S6% sample compared to the control ink, indicating an increase in porosity. It is evident that the addition of CRF introduces openings within the microstructure of the inks, which is reflected in the increased porosity corresponding to the higher proportions of added CRF. In the case of S8%, the observed decrease is likely due to structural collapse, as the proportion of the gelling agent (starch derived from potato peel) has diminished to the point where the structure can no longer be maintained, resulting in a reduction in porosity values

3. Conclusions

This study has demonstrated the potential of carob residue as a valuable source of dietary fiber, with a high fiber content (44.5 ± 3.0%) and a cellulose content of 24.4%. These findings are significant, as cellulose, a key component of dietary fiber, plays an important role in disease prevention. In addition to its composition, the functional properties of CRF (Carob Residue Fiber) are noteworthy. Each gram of CRF was capable of adsorbing approximately 6 g of lipids and retaining up to 4 g of water, highlighting its potential use as an ingredient in food formulations, particularly for developing cellulose-enriched products. The feasibility of using cellulose-based gels, derived from agro-industrial by-products such as potato peel and carob pulp, for 3D printing of structured foods was confirmed. The addition of CRF to these gels significantly impacted their rheological, textural, and printability properties. Viscosity decreased with increasing CRF content, with the optimal range for 3D printing performance being between 3% and 4%. Higher CRF concentrations (6% and 8%) resulted in increased cohesiveness and adhesiveness, compared to the control gel. Moreover, while low CRF additions (<6%) did not significantly alter the microstructure, higher proportions (>6%) led to substantial structural modifications.
In conclusion, the results of this study support the use of carob residue fiber as an effective ingredient for the formulation of cellulose-based gels for 3D food printing. This not only opens new possibilities for the development of fiber-rich foods but also provides a sustainable approach for the valorization of agro-industrial by-products.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Raw Matter

The raw material used in this study was a mixture of flours from 6 different varieties of carob, specifically the Bugadera, Fulla de raó, Valenciana, Rotja, Franco, and De la Mel varieties. All the carob samples were collected from Llucmajor, Majora (Balearic Island, Spain). All samples were collected during the autumn of 2022.
To obtain the flour mix, an equal amount (approximately 2 kg) of carob pulp from each of the 6 varieties was ground with an IKA M20 laboratory mill (Barcelona, Spain). Subsequently, the flour obtained was sieved to obtain a particle size smaller than 0.25 mm.
Once the different flours were prepared, equal amounts of each were mixed to obtain a homogeneous blend of flours. From this flour, the fibre of carob pulp was obtained (FCP).

4.2. Obtainment of the Cellulose Rich-Fraction (CRF)

The CRF was extracted by obtaining the AIR (Alcohol Insoluble Residue). The procedure used to obtain the AIR has been previously described by Femenia et al. [39], with some modifications. Approximately 20 g of carob pulp flour was mixed with ethanol to reach a final concentration of 85% (v/v). The mixture was homogenized for 1 minute at 13,000 rpm with an Ultra Turrax (Heidolph DIAX 600). Thereafter, the mixture was brought to a boil for 5 minutes to inactivate the enzymes that could cause the degradation of the various polysaccharides in the cell wall. Then, the sample was homogenized again for 2 minutes at 13,000 rpm and brought to a boil for 1 minute. The resulting mixture was filtered using a glass fiber (Whatman GF-C). Two additional washes were carried out in ethanol, with the final one performed in absolute ethanol. The sample was then filtered and rinsed with absolute ethanol and acetone. The yield of AIRs was expressed in grams of AIR per 100 grams of carob pulp flour. This AIR will be called FCB (fiber carob pulp)

4.3. Composition of the CRF

The neutral sugars that constitute the polysaccharides were released through acid hydrolysis (Saeman hydrolysis) in sulfuric acid and subsequently converted into alditol acetates. These monosaccharides (rhamnose, fucose, arabinose, xylose, manose, galactose and glucose) were then separated and analyzed using gas–liquid chromatography, following the method described by Dalmau et al. [40]. The uronic acids were quantified by colorimetry as total uronic acid from samples hydrolyzed for 1 h at 100 ºC [41].
From the previously described analysis, cellulose was determined by multiplying the content in glucose by 0.9 [42].

4.4. CRF Functional Properties

In this study, the properties related to the hydration process were evaluated, specifically the swelling capacity (Sw) and water retention capacity (WRC), as well as the ability to absorb lipids, expressed as fat adsorption capacity (FAC).
For the Sw, approximately 1 g CRF was placed in a test tube containing 10 mL of a 1M sodium phosphate buffer solution at pH 6.2, which simulates the pH of many foods. The sample and buffer were left to stand for 24 hours to reach equilibrium, corresponding to the maximum swelling the sample could achieve. After 24 hours, the volume of the hydrated sample in the test tube was measured [43].
The WRC was measured by suspending about 1 g of CRF in an excess of a 1M sodium phosphate buffer solution (pH 6.2) for 24 hours. After this time, the suspension was centrifuged (ALC 4218 centrifuge, Thermo Scientific, Italy) at 1750 g for 25 minutes. The two resulting phases, solid and liquid, were then separated by decantation, and the solid phase was weighed. Water retention capacity was calculated as the weight difference between the dry and hydrated samples. Similarly, the FAC was measured by suspending the sample of CRF in sunflower oil for 24 hours. After this time, the solid and liquid phases were separated by centrifugation (25 minutes at 1750 g) and decantation. The solid phase was weighed, and the FAC was calculated as the weight difference between the dry sample and the sample containing retained oil [44].

4.5. Preparation of the Cellulose-Based Gel for 3D Printing

Different cellulose-based gels were prepared using dry potato peel flour as the base of the formulation. The potato peel flour was obtained by drying the potato peels at 60 ºC for 7 h in a convective oven (Dry Fruit Machine, Akcome Europe GmbH, China). Thereafter, they were grounded and sieved (< 0.5 mm). The CRF was used to partially replace the potato peel flour in different proportions as represented in Table 5, maintaining the total solid content at 15 % wm (wet matter) in all the samples. A control cellulose-based gel was prepared using only potato peel flour. The CRF and the potato peel flour were weighed in powder form and mixed with distilled water previously heated to 90 ± 5 °C, with mechanical stirring (700 rpm), to allow the starch present in the potato peel flour to gelatinize, thus obtaining the appropriate consistency for printing, following the methodology described by Liu et al. [45,46]. Then, the cellulose-based gel was cooled in an ice water bath until reaching a temperature of about 20 ± 3 ºC.

4.6. Characterization of the Cellulose-Based Gel

Different properties of the cellulose-based gel were determined to evaluate the effect of the addition of CRF.

4.6.1. Apparent Viscosity

The apparent viscosity of the cellulose-based gel was measured using a VISCO R rotational viscometer (Selecta, Spain), equipped with a type R7 spindle of 3 mm in diameter, operating at a rotation speed of 50 rpm. The temperature during the analysis was kept constant at 21 ± 2 °C.

4.6.2. Water Distribution

To investigate the water distribution within the cellulose-based gels, they were evaluated by low-field nuclear magnetic resonance using an Mq20 NMR analyzer (Bruker Biosciences, Madrid, Spain) with a magnetic field strength of 0.47 T, resulting in a frequency of 19.95 MHz, while the magnet temperature was maintained at 40.0 ± 0.1 °C. All samples were wrapped in plastic film and placed in 18 mm diameter tubes. The relaxation time (T2) was determined, as this parameter is related to the structure and rheological properties of the material, using Carr-Purcell-Meiboom-Gill (CPMG) sequences [47,48].
The T2 relaxation curve was mathematically modeled as an exponential function, and the inverse Laplace transform (ILT) was applied to obtain the relaxation time distributions from the exponential decay curve. This analysis was carried out using the Origin software (Origin 2021b, Northampton, USA) following the methodology described by Sánchez et al. [49].

4.6.3. Printability

The cellulose-based gels, maintained at a temperature of 20 ± 3 ºC, were transferred into printing syringes for the 3D printing process. A Foodini 3D printer (Natural Machines, Spain) was used. This device is a commercial extrusion-based printer, with a 1.5 mm diameter cannula. Samples were printed in the form of 2 square prisms. The template list available in the Foodini printer software was selected, with a size of 2 x 2 x 1 cm and a total of 7 layers for measuring textural properties, while 2 square prisms of 1.5 x 1.5 x 0.7 cm with a total of 5 layers were also printed to determine structural properties. Finally, a gear with a 4 cm radius and 0.7 cm height was printed with a total of 5 layers, to determine printability. Each layer had a height of 1.4 mm and a printing speed of 1000 mm/min. The printing conditions were optimized beforehand through preliminary experiments.
Photographs of the structures were taken immediately after printing and were visually evaluated using a scale ranging from 1 (very poor) to 5 (very good), based on printing precision, smoothness of the printed products, and shape stability, according to the method described by Lille et al. [12].

4.7. Characterization of 3D Printed Samples

Different properties of the 3D printed samples were determined to evaluate the effect of the addition of CRF in cellulose-based gels.

4.7.1. Textural Properties

Texture analysis was performed through mechanical tests with a ZWICK Z100 device (Zwick GmbH & Co, Germany), equipped with a 200 N load cell and a force measurement accuracy of 0.20%. Each sample was subjected to two consecutive compression cycles until achieving a 40% deformation, which represents the action of two bites. All experiments were performed at room temperature. The objective was to collect data that would allow the calculation of different textural parameters such as hardness, cohesion, adhesiveness, and gumminess using the method [50], applying the Origin software (Origin 2021b, Northampton, DT, USA). Three repetitions of the experiments were performed on different printed samples, and the results were expressed as the mean ± standard deviation.

4.7.2. Porosity

To determine the porosity, two methodologies were followed to compare the results. One based on scanning microscopy was carried out following the methodology described by Reche et al.[51], where the samples were subjected to a freeze-drying process using a LyoQuest device (Telstar, Barcelona, Spain). This process was performed at a pressure of 0.3 mbar and a temperature of -50 °C for 72 hours. After the freeze-drying process, the samples were fractured using cryofracture with liquid nitrogen and fixed on a support using carbon adhesive, and were directly observed in a Hitachi scanning electron microscope, model S-3400N, with a resolution of 5 μm, an acceleration voltage of 10 kV, and a working pressure of 40 Pa.
The images obtained were compared with the porosity data obtained by the method described by Baniasadi et al. [52], where the freeze-dried samples, using the same previous procedure, were weighed and measured to determine their volume. Subsequently, they were submerged in absolute ethanol for 48 hours. Finally, a second weighing was performed, and porosity (Φ) was calculated using equation 1.
Φ = m s a t m 0 ρ * V * 100
Where “msat” refers to the ethanol-saturated mass of the sample, “m0” refers to the initial mass of the sample, “ρ” corresponds to the density of absolute ethanol, and “V” corresponds to the volume of the sample.

4.8. Statistical Analysis

Statistical analyses were performed using R software version 4.2.2 ([53]) in conjunction with RStudio IDE ([54]). The characteristics of the cellulose-based gels and printed pastes, such as textural properties, viscosity, and porosity, were measured in triplicate. Normality and homoscedasticity tests were performed for all studied variables using the Shapiro-Wilk test and the Levene test.
When the data followed a normal distribution and the variances showed homogeneity, ANOVA and Tukey tests were used to evaluate the existence and degree of significant differences, respectively. Significant variations were considered when the p-value was less than 0.05.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Antoni Femenia and Mónica Umaña; methodology, Antoni Capellà; formal analysis, Esperanza Dalmau and Mónica Umaña; data curation, Antoni Capellà, Esperanza Dalmau and Mónica Umaña; writing—original draft preparation, Mónica Umaña and Esperanza Dalmau; writing—review and editing, Antoni Femenia and Juan Cárcel; supervision, Antoni Femenia and Juan Cárcel. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by BIA 05/21 of Fons de Garantia Agrària i Pesquera de les Illes Balears (FOGAIBA), and grant PID2022-136889OB-C21 funded by MICIU/AEI/ 10.13039/501100011033 and by ERDF, EU.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

10.4121/95ea33f3-86ec-4b3c-a844-3e65cd9b65cc.

Acknowledgments

We thank Camp Mallorquí cooperative from the Balearic Islands for providing the carob samples, as well as the experimental assistance by Joan Cifre and Antoni Busquets from the facilities in Serveis Científico Tècnics from UIB.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest

References

  1. Singh, L.; Kaur, S.; Aggarwal, P. Techno and Bio Functional Characterization of Industrial Potato Waste for Formulation of Phytonutrients Rich Snack Product. Food Biosci 2022, 49, 101824. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Phanthong, P.; Reubroycharoen, P.; Hao, X.; Xu, G.; Abudula, A.; Guan, G. Nanocellulose: Extraction and Application. 2018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Katahira, R.; Elder, T.J.; Beckham, G.T. Chapter 1. A Brief Introduction to Lignin Structure. In; 2018; pp. 1–20.
  4. Brassesco, M.E.; Brandão, T.R.S.; Silva, C.L.M.; Pintado, M. Carob Bean (Ceratonia Siliqua L.): A New Perspective for Functional Food. Trends Food Sci Technol 2021, 114, 310–322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Caliskan, A.; Abdullah, N.; Ishak, N.; Caliskan, I.T. Physicochemical, Microbial and Sensory Properties of Wild Carob Bar: A Shelf-Life Study. Int J Gastron Food Sci 2023, 31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Ikram, A.; Khalid, W.; Wajeeha Zafar, K. ul; Ali, A.; Afzal, M.F.; Aziz, A.; Faiz ul Rasool, I.; Al-Farga, A.; Aqlan, F.; Koraqi, H. Nutritional, Biochemical, and Clinical Applications of Carob: A Review. Food Sci Nutr 2023, 11, 3641–3654. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Loullis, A.; Pinakoulaki, E. Carob as Cocoa Substitute: A Review on Composition, Health Benefits and Food Applications. European Food Research and Technology 2017 244:6 2017, 244, 959–977. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Correa, M.J.; Salinas, M. V.; Carbas, B.; Ferrero, C.; Brites, C.; Puppo, M.C. Technological Quality of Dough and Breads from Commercial Algarroba–Wheat Flour Blends. J Food Sci Technol 2017, 54, 2104–2114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Restuccia, D.; Esposito, L.; Spizzirri, U.G.; Martuscelli, M.; Caputo, P.; Rossi, C.O.; Clodoveo, M.L.; Pujia, R.; Mazza, E.; Pujia, A.; et al. Formulation of a Gluten-Free Carob-Based Bakery Product: Evaluation of Glycemic Index, Antioxidant Activity, Rheological Properties, and Sensory Features. Fermentation 2023, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Hopson, C.; Rigual, V.; Domínguez, J.C.; Alonso, M.V.; Oliet, M.; Rodríguez, F. A New Approach for the Use of Cellulose-Rich Solids from Biorefinery in the Formulation of Gel-like Materials. Ind Crops Prod 2022, 186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Dai, L.; Cheng, T.; Duan, C.; Zhao, W.; Zhang, W.; Zou, X.; Aspler, J.; Ni, Y. 3D Printing Using Plant-Derived Cellulose and Its Derivatives: A Review. Carbohydr Polym 2019, 203, 71–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Lille, M.; Nurmela, A.; Nordlund, E.; Metsä-Kortelainen, S.; Sozer, N. Applicability of Protein and Fiber-Rich Food Materials in Extrusion-Based 3D Printing. J Food Eng 2018, 220, 20–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Guo, C.; Zhang, M.; Devahastin, S. 3D Extrusion-Based Printability Evaluation of Selected Cereal Grains by Computational Fluid Dynamic Simulation. J Food Eng 2020, 286, 110113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Liu, Z.; Chen, H.; Zheng, B.; Xie, F.; Chen, L. Understanding the Structure and Rheological Properties of Potato Starch Induced by Hot-Extrusion 3D Printing. Food Hydrocoll 2020, 105, 105812. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Godoi, F.C.; Prakash, S.; Bhandari, B.R. 3d Printing Technologies Applied for Food Design: Status and Prospects. J Food Eng 2016, 179, 44–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Zheng, L.; Yu, Y.; Tong, Z.; Zou, Q.; Han, S.; Jiang, H. The Characteristics of Starch Gels Molded by 3D Printing. J Food Process Preserv 2019, 43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Jagadiswaran, B.; Alagarasan, V.; Palanivelu, P.; Theagarajan, R.; Moses, J.A.; Anandharamakrishnan, C. Valorization of Food Industry Waste and By-Products Using 3D Printing: A Study on the Development of Value-Added Functional Cookies. Future Foods 2021, 4, 100036. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Reche, C.; Umaña, M.; Dalmau, E.; Carcel, J.A.; Eim, V. Improving 3D Printed Food Characteristics by Using Mushroom By-Products and Olive Oil in the Formulation. LWT 2024, 202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Muthurajan, M.; Veeramani, A.; Rahul, T.; Gupta, R.K.; Anukiruthika, T.; Moses, J.A.; Anandharamakrishnan, C. Valorization of Food Industry Waste Streams Using 3D Food Printing: A Study on Noodles Prepared from Potato Peel Waste. Food Bioproc Tech 2021, 14, 1817–1834. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Cikrikci Erunsal, S.; Basturk, Z.S.; Canturkoglu, I.; Ozturk, H.I. Development of 3D Printed Dark Chocolate Sweetened with Carob Extract. Int J Gastron Food Sci 2023, 34, 100794. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Pavičić, T.V.; Grgić, T.; Ivanov, M.; Novotni, D.; Herceg, Z. Influence of Flour and Fat Type on Dough Rheology and Technological Characteristics of 3d-Printed Cookies. Foods 2021, 10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Nasar-Abbas, S.M.; e-Huma, Z.; Vu, T.H.; Khan, M.K.; Esbenshade, H.; Jayasena, V. Carob Kibble: A Bioactive-Rich Food Ingredient. Compr Rev Food Sci Food Saf 2016, 15, 63–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Femenia, A.; Sánchez, E.S.; Simal, S.; Rosselló, C. Compositional Features of Polysaccharides from Aloe Vera (Aloe Barbadensis Miller) Plant Tissues. Carbohydr Polym 1999, 39, 109–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Zhu, B.J.; Zayed, M.Z.; Zhu, H.X.; Zhao, J.; Li, S.P. Functional Polysaccharides of Carob Fruit: A Review. Chinese Medicine (United Kingdom) 2019, 14, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Petkova, N.; Petrova, I.; Ivanov, I.; Mihov, R.; Hadjikinova, R.; Ognyanov, M.; Nikolova, V. Nutritional and Antioxidant Potential of Carob (Ceratonia Siliqua) Flour and Evaluation of Functional Properties of Its Polysaccharide Fraction.
  26. Fidan, H.; Stankov, S.; Petkova, N.; Petkova, Z.; Iliev, A.; Stoyanova, M.; Ivanova, T.; Zhelyazkov, N.; Ibrahim, S.; Stoyanova, A.; et al. Evaluation of Chemical Composition, Antioxidant Potential and Functional Properties of Carob (Ceratonia Siliqua L.) Seeds. J Food Sci Technol 2020, 57, 2404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Boulos, N.N.; Greenfield, H.; Wills, R.B.H. Water Holding Capacity of Selected Soluble and Insoluble Dietary Fibre. Int J Food Prop 2000, 3, 217–231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Liu, C.; Ho, C.; Wang, J. The Development of 3D Food Printer for Printing Fibrous Meat Materials. [CrossRef]
  29. Reche, C.; Umaña, M.; Dalmau, E.; Carcel, J.A.; Eim, V. Improving 3D Printed Food Characteristics by Using Mushroom By-Products and Olive Oil in the Formulation. LWT 2024, 202, 116238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Chen, Y.; Zhang, M.; Phuhongsung, P. 3D Printing of Protein-Based Composite Fruit and Vegetable Gel System. LWT 2021, 141, 110978. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Phuhongsung, P.; Zhang, M.; Devahastin, S. Investigation on 3D Printing Ability of Soybean Protein Isolate Gels and Correlations with Their Rheological and Textural Properties via LF-NMR Spectroscopic Characteristics. LWT 2020, 122, 109019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Liu, Z.; Chen, H.; Zheng, B.; Xie, F.; Chen, L. Understanding the Structure and Rheological Properties of Potato Starch Induced by Hot-Extrusion 3D Printing. Food Hydrocoll 2020, 105, 105812. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Lille, M.; Nurmela, A.; Nordlund, E.; Metsä-Kortelainen, S.; Sozer, N. Applicability of Protein and Fiber-Rich Food Materials in Extrusion-Based 3D Printing. J Food Eng 2018, 220, 20–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Mirazimi, F.; Saldo, J.; Sepulcre, F.; Gràcia, A.; Pujola, M. Enriched Puree Potato with Soy Protein for Dysphagia Patients by Using 3D Printing. Food Front 2022, 3, 706–715. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Zhang, C.; Wang, C.S.; Therriault, D.; Heuzey, M.C. Development of Aqueous Protein/Polysaccharide Mixture-Based Inks for 3D Printing towards Food Applications. Food Hydrocoll 2022, 131, 107742. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Siamand, R.; Deeth, H.C.; Al-Saadi, J.M.S. Textural and Sensory Properties of a Calcium-Induced Milk Gel. J Food Eng 2014, 139, 10–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Rosenthal, A.J.; Thompson, P. What Is Cohesiveness?—A Linguistic Exploration of the Food Texture Testing Literature. J Texture Stud 2021, 52, 294–302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Shaikh, M.; Ali, T.M.; Hasnain, A. Utilization of Chemically Modified Pearl Millet Starches in Preparation of Custards with Improved Cold Storage Stability. Int J Biol Macromol 2017, 104, 360–366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Femenia, A.; Sánchez, E.S.; Simal, S.; Rosselló, C. Compositional Features of Polysaccharides from Aloe Vera (Aloe Barbadensis Miller) Plant Tissues. Carbohydr Polym 1999, 39, 109–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Dalmau, M.E.; Bornhorst, G.M.; Eim, V.; Rosselló, C.; Simal, S. Effects of Freezing, Freeze Drying and Convective Drying on in Vitro Gastric Digestion of Apples. Food Chem 2017, 215, 7–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Coimbra, M. a; Delgadillo, I.; Waldron, K.W.; Selvendran, R.R. Isolation and Analysis of Cell Wall Polymers from Olive Pulp. Modern Methods of Plant Analysis 1996, 17, 19–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Khatun, M.M.; Li, Y.H.; Liu, C.G.; Zhao, X.Q.; Bai, F.W. Fed-Batch Saccharification and Ethanol Fermentation of Jerusalem Artichoke Stalks by an Inulinase Producing Saccharomyces Cerevisiae MK01. RSC Adv 2015, 5, 107112–107118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Kuniak, L.; Marchessault, R.H. Study of the Crosslinking Reaction between Epichlorohydrin and Starch. Starch - Stärke 1972, 24, 110–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. González-Centeno, *!!! REPLACE !!!*; Rosselló, C.; Simal, S.; Garau, M.C.; López, F.; Femenia, A. Physico-Chemical Properties of Cell Wall Materials Obtained from Ten Grape Varieties and Their Byproducts: Grape Pomaces and Stems. LWT - Food Science and Technology 2010, 43, 1580–1586. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Liu, Z.; Zhang, M.; Bhandari, B.; Yang, C. Impact of Rheological Properties of Mashed Potatoes on 3D Printing. J Food Eng 2018, 220, 76–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Liu, Z.; Zhang, M.; Yang, C. hui Dual Extrusion 3D Printing of Mashed Potatoes/Strawberry Juice Gel. LWT 2018, 96, 589–596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Rodríguez, Ó.; Llabrés, P.J.; Simal, S.; Femenia, A.; Rosselló, C. Intensification of Predrying Treatments by Means of Ultrasonic Assistance: Effects on Water Mobility, PPO Activity, Microstructure, and Drying Kinetics of Apple. Food Bioproc Tech 2015, 8, 503–515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Yang, G.; Tao, Y.; Wang, P.; Xu, X.; Zhu, X. Optimizing 3D Printing of Chicken Meat by Response Surface Methodology and Genetic Algorithm: Feasibility Study of 3D Printed Chicken Product. LWT 2022, 154, 112693. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Sánchez-Alonso, I.; Martinez, I.; Sánchez-Valencia, J.; Careche, M. Estimation of Freezing Storage Time and Quality Changes in Hake (Merluccius Merluccius, L.) by Low Field NMR. Food Chem 2012, 135, 1626–1634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Bourne, M.C. Food Texture and Viscosity: 4 Principles of Objective Texture Measurements; 2002; ISBN 9780121190620.
  51. Reche, C.; Rosselló, C.; Dalmau, E.; Eim, V.; Simal, S. Quantification of Microstructural Changes in Artichoke By-Products by Image Analysis after High-Power Ultrasound-Assisted Extraction of Bioactive Compounds. LWT 2022, 171, 114127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Baniasadi, H.; Ajdary, R.; Trifol, J.; Rojas, O.J.; Seppälä, J. Direct Ink Writing of Aloe Vera/Cellulose Nanofibrils Bio-Hydrogels. Carbohydr Polym 2021, 266, 118114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. R Core Team R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing 2017.
  54. RStudio Team RStudio: Integrated Development for, R. RStudio 2022.
Figure 1. Apparent viscosity of the cellulose-based gels formulated with 0, 2, 3, 4, 6 and 8 % CRF. Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences (p < 0.05).
Figure 1. Apparent viscosity of the cellulose-based gels formulated with 0, 2, 3, 4, 6 and 8 % CRF. Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences (p < 0.05).
Preprints 138256 g001
Figure 2. Distributions of the relaxation time after inverse Laplace transform analysis of LF-NMR spectra of the cellulose-based gels formulated with 0, 2, 3, 4, 6 and 8 % CRF.
Figure 2. Distributions of the relaxation time after inverse Laplace transform analysis of LF-NMR spectra of the cellulose-based gels formulated with 0, 2, 3, 4, 6 and 8 % CRF.
Preprints 138256 g002
Figure 3. Textural properties: hardness (a), adhesiveness (b), cohesiveness (c), and gumminess (d) of the printed gels (shape-stable) formulated with 0, 2, 3, 4, 6 and 8 % CRF. Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences (p < 0.05).
Figure 3. Textural properties: hardness (a), adhesiveness (b), cohesiveness (c), and gumminess (d) of the printed gels (shape-stable) formulated with 0, 2, 3, 4, 6 and 8 % CRF. Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences (p < 0.05).
Preprints 138256 g003
Figure 4. Percentages of porosity for the printed samples across the different formulations. Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences (p < 0.05).
Figure 4. Percentages of porosity for the printed samples across the different formulations. Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences (p < 0.05).
Preprints 138256 g004
Table 1. Monosaccharides composition of carob cellulose-rich fraction (CRF).
Table 1. Monosaccharides composition of carob cellulose-rich fraction (CRF).
Monosaccharid mg/g CRF
Rhamnose 10.7 ± 1.6
Fucose 7.5 ± 1.1
Arabinose 78.4 ± 6.6
Xylose 158.2 ± 13.8
Mannose 24.8 ± 3.1
Galactose 47.4 ± 4.3
Glucose 179.0 ± 18.6
Uronic Acids 153.2 ± 9.0
Total 659.5 ± 42.2
Table 2. Functional properties of carob cellulose-rich fraction (CRF).
Table 2. Functional properties of carob cellulose-rich fraction (CRF).
Sw (ml/g) FAC (g/g) WRC (g/g)
5,9 ± 0,5 6,5 ± 0,5 4,0 ± 0,1
Table 3. Representative pictures of printed samples with different formulations and printability mark for each sample on a scale from 1 (very bad) to 5 (very good).
Table 3. Representative pictures of printed samples with different formulations and printability mark for each sample on a scale from 1 (very bad) to 5 (very good).
Top View Front View Scale
Control Preprints 138256 i001 Preprints 138256 i002 4
S2% Preprints 138256 i003 Preprints 138256 i004 5
S3% Preprints 138256 i005 Preprints 138256 i006 5
S4% Preprints 138256 i007 Preprints 138256 i008 4
S6% Preprints 138256 i009 Preprints 138256 i010 3
S8% Preprints 138256 i011 Preprints 138256 i012 2
Table 4. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images of different formulations.
Table 4. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images of different formulations.
Control Preprints 138256 i013 S2% Preprints 138256 i014
S3% Preprints 138256 i015 S4% Preprints 138256 i016
S6% Preprints 138256 i017 S8% Preprints 138256 i018
Table 5. Composition of the cellulose-based gels for the 3D printing.
Table 5. Composition of the cellulose-based gels for the 3D printing.
Inks CRF content (%) Potato peel poder (%)
Control 0 15
S 2 2 13
S 3 3 12
S 4 4 11
S 6 6 9
S 8 8 7
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
Copyright: This open access article is published under a Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 license, which permit the free download, distribution, and reuse, provided that the author and preprint are cited in any reuse.
Prerpints.org logo

Preprints.org is a free preprint server supported by MDPI in Basel, Switzerland.

Subscribe

Disclaimer

Terms of Use

Privacy Policy

Privacy Settings

© 2025 MDPI (Basel, Switzerland) unless otherwise stated